论文标题
快速流量:快速城市风速预测的AI
FastFlow: AI for Fast Urban Wind Velocity Prediction
论文作者
论文摘要
包括深度学习在内的数据驱动方法已显示出许多领域的替代模型的巨大希望。这些扩展到可持续性的各个领域。数据驱动方法尚未应用太多的一个有趣的方向是对计划和设计的城市布局的快速定量评估。特别是,城市设计通常涉及多个目标之间的复杂权衡,包括限制城市建立和/或考虑城市热岛效应的限制。因此,具有快速的替代模型来预测假设布局的城市特征,例如行人级风速,而不必运行计算昂贵且耗时的高保真数值模拟。然后可以将这种快速替代物可能集成到其他设计优化框架中,包括生成模型或其他基于梯度的方法。在这里,我们介绍了CNN用于城市布局表征,通常是通过高保真数值模拟完成的。我们将该模型进一步应用于首次展示其用于数据驱动的行人级风速预测的实用性。这项工作中的数据集包括基于来自现实世界中高度建立的城市城市的随机样本的风速的高保真数值模拟。然后,我们提供从训练有素的CNN获得的预测结果,证明了以前看不见的城市布局的测试误差低于0.1 m/s。我们进一步说明这对目的是有用的,例如快速评估行人风速度,以实现潜在的新布局。希望该数据集能够进一步加速数据驱动的城市AI的研究,即使我们的基线模型有助于与未来方法进行定量比较。
Data-driven approaches, including deep learning, have shown great promise as surrogate models across many domains. These extend to various areas in sustainability. An interesting direction for which data-driven methods have not been applied much yet is in the quick quantitative evaluation of urban layouts for planning and design. In particular, urban designs typically involve complex trade-offs between multiple objectives, including limits on urban build-up and/or consideration of urban heat island effect. Hence, it can be beneficial to urban planners to have a fast surrogate model to predict urban characteristics of a hypothetical layout, e.g. pedestrian-level wind velocity, without having to run computationally expensive and time-consuming high-fidelity numerical simulations. This fast surrogate can then be potentially integrated into other design optimization frameworks, including generative models or other gradient-based methods. Here we present the use of CNNs for urban layout characterization that is typically done via high-fidelity numerical simulation. We further apply this model towards a first demonstration of its utility for data-driven pedestrian-level wind velocity prediction. The data set in this work comprises results from high-fidelity numerical simulations of wind velocities for a diverse set of realistic urban layouts, based on randomized samples from a real-world, highly built-up urban city. We then provide prediction results obtained from the trained CNN, demonstrating test errors of under 0.1 m/s for previously unseen urban layouts. We further illustrate how this can be useful for purposes such as rapid evaluation of pedestrian wind velocity for a potential new layout. It is hoped that this data set will further accelerate research in data-driven urban AI, even as our baseline model facilitates quantitative comparison to future methods.