论文标题
在定量成对比较方法中对单个判断的操纵
Manipulation of individual judgments in the quantitative pairwise comparisons method
论文作者
论文摘要
决策方法经常使用比较成对替代方案的技术。在这种方法中，要求专家比较不同的选项，然后根据获得的结果创建定量排名。人们普遍认为，专家（决策者）的判断是诚实的。在我们的工作中，我们考虑了一种专家容易受贿赂的情况。为此，我们定义了一个框架，该框架使我们能够确定预期的操作，并提出三种实现预期目标的算法。分析这些算法可能会提供有助于防御此类攻击的线索。
Decision-making methods very often use the technique of comparing alternatives in pairs. In this approach, experts are asked to compare different options, and then a quantitative ranking is created from the results obtained. It is commonly believed that experts (decision-makers) are honest in their judgments. In our work, we consider a scenario in which experts are vulnerable to bribery. For this purpose, we define a framework that allows us to determine the intended manipulation and present three algorithms for achieving the intended goal. Analyzing these algorithms may provide clues to help defend against such attacks.
