论文标题
恒定功率与恒定电压致动,以扫描频率扫描
Constant-power versus constant-voltage actuation in frequency sweeps for acoustofluidic applications
论文作者
论文摘要
在频率扫描过程中,在频率扫描过程中以恒定的电压或恒定功率提供压电传感器可以在确定大气循环频率的情况下会导致不同的结果,在研究液态液体液体液体液体液液的粒子速度时,可以观察到这些频率。在这项工作中,考虑了三种情况:(1)恒定输入电压到功率放大器中,(2)在压电传感器上恒定电压,以及(3)传感器中恒定的平均功率耗散。对于每种情况,比较了测量和模拟响应,并获得了良好的一致性。结果表明,情况1是最简单,最常用的方法,在很大程度上受使用的放大器和接线的阻抗的影响,因此不适合对Acoustofluidic设备的内在特性的可重复表征。案例2强烈利用频率的共振,产生压电传感器的最低阻抗,因此,在频率下,远离传感器共振的声音响应中的小细节很容易被遗漏。案例3提供了最可靠的方法,既揭示了谐音频率,在该频率中最高,以及整个频谱中的其他二次共振。
Supplying a piezoelectric transducer with constant voltage or constant power during a frequency sweep can lead to different results in the determination of the acoustofluidic resonance frequencies, which are observed when studying the acoustophoretic displacements and velocities of particles suspended in a liquid-filled microchannel. In this work, three cases are considered: (1) Constant input voltage into the power amplifier, (2) constant voltage across the piezoelectric transducer, and (3) constant average power dissipation in the transducer. For each case, the measured and the simulated responses are compared, and good agreement is obtained. It is shown that Case 1, the simplest and most frequently used approach, is largely affected by the impedance of the used amplifier and wiring, so it is therefore not suitable for a reproducible characterization of the intrinsic properties of the acoustofluidic device. Case 2 strongly favors resonances at frequencies yielding the lowest impedance of the piezoelectric transducer, so small details in the acoustic response at frequencies far from the transducer resonance can easily be missed. Case 3 provides the most reliable approach, revealing both the resonant frequency, where the power-efficiency is the highest, as well as other secondary resonances across the spectrum.