论文标题
一切都是Quantum Spooky and Trigy吗?探索TEDX谈话中有关量子科学和技术的大众交流
Is everything quantum spooky and weird? An exploration of popular communication about quantum science and technology in TEDx talks
论文作者
论文摘要
研究人员指出了与量子科学和技术普及有关的四个潜在问题。其中包括缺乏解释量子2.0技术的潜在量子概念,将量子科学和技术构建为怪异和神秘的,以公共利益而狭义地构架量子技术,并且非常重视量子计算。迄今为止,尚无研究评估这些潜在问题是否真正存在于量子科学的流行沟通中。在此内容分析中,我们研究了501 TEDX与量子科学和技术内容的谈判中这些潜在问题的存在。结果表明,尽管大多数专家(70%)解释了量子2.0技术的至少一个基本量子概念(叠加,纠缠或上下文),但只有28%的非专家这样做。其次,大约四分之一的会谈中出现了怪异/神秘的框架。第三,发现了一个狭窄的公共良好框架,主要是通过强调量子科学和技术的好处(在谈话中比风险多6倍)。最后,主要重点是以其他量子技术为代价量子计算。总之,在TEDX谈话中确实发现了所提出的框架,确实有关注量子计算,但至少专家经常解释基本的量子概念。
Researchers point to four potential issues related to the popularisation of quantum science and technology. These include a lack of explaining underlying quantum concepts of quantum 2.0 technology, framing quantum science and technology as spooky and enigmatic, framing quantum technology narrowly in terms of public good and having a strong focus on quantum computing. To date, no research has yet assessed whether these potential issues are actually present in popular communication about quantum science. In this content analysis, we have examined the presence of these potential issues in 501 TEDx talks with quantum science and technology content. Results show that while most experts (70%) explained at least one underlying quantum concept (superposition, entanglement or contextuality) of quantum 2.0 technology, only 28% of the non-experts did so. Secondly, the spooky/enigmatic frame was present in about a quarter of the talks. Thirdly, a narrow public good frame was found, predominantly by highlighting the benefits of quantum science and technology (found in over 6 times more talks than risks). Finally, the main focus was on quantum computing at the expense of other quantum technologies. In conclusion, the proposed frames are indeed found in TEDx talks, there is indeed a focus on quantum computing, but at least experts explain underlying quantum concepts often.