论文标题

单流体与多流体:单流体和多流体粉尘模型之间的比较

Single Fluid vs. Multifluid: Comparison between single fluid and multifluid dust models for disc planet interactions

论文作者

Chan, Kevin, Paardekooper, Sijme-Jan

论文摘要

最新观察到原星盘中的灰尘间隙和灰尘环等子结构的观察表明,将灰尘纳入纯粹的气盘模型的重要性。同时,分别模拟灰尘和气体的标准模型会出现计算困难。其中包括准确模拟粉尘和气体耦合良好的相互作用以及在气相分辨率以下的区域中的灰尘浓度问题之间的相互作用的成本。我们测试了一种单一的流体方法,该方法结合了对小颗粒有效的末端速度近似,通过修改FARGO3D可以克服这些困难。我们将这种单个流体模型与多流体模型进行比较,用于各种行星质量。在所有情况下,我们都会发现灰尘密度分布的差异。对于高质量的,间隙开放的行星,我们发现所产生的灰尘环的幅度差异,我们将其归因于末端速度近似值的故障。对于低质量行星,两种模型除了在旋旋区域外,终端速度近似显示过度密集的灰尘叶。我们暂时将其解释为具有热扩散的非等热模拟中观察到的热裂片的灰尘等效物,但是为了确认这一点,需要更多的工作。在相同的分辨率下,末端速度近似模型的计算时间显着少于两个流体模型。我们得出的结论是,终端速度近似是建模原星盘的有价值工具,但是在涉及冲击时应注意该小心。

Recent observations of substructures such as dust gaps and dust rings in protoplanetary discs have highlighted the importance of including dust into purely gaseous disc models. At the same time, computational difficulties arise with the standard models of simulating the dust and gas separately. These include the cost of accurately simulating the interactions between well coupled dust and gas and issues of dust concentration in areas below resolution of the gas phase. We test a single fluid approach, that incorporates the terminal velocity approximation valid for small particles, which can overcome these difficulties, through modification of FARGO3D. We compare this single fluid model with a multifluid model for a variety of planet masses. We find differences in the dust density distribution in all cases. For high-mass, gap-opening planets we find differences in the amplitude of the resulting dust rings, which we attribute to the failure of the terminal velocity approximation around shocks. For low-mass planets, both models agree everywhere except in the corotation region, where the terminal velocity approximation shows overdense dust lobes. We tentatively interpret these as dusty equivalents of thermal lobes seen in non-isothermal simulations with thermal diffusion, but more work is necessary to confirm this. At the same resolution, the computational time for the terminal velocity approximation model is significantly less than a two fluid model. We conclude that the terminal velocity approximation is a valuable tool for modelling a protoplanetary disc but that care should be taken when shocks are involved.

扫码加入交流群

加入微信交流群

微信交流群二维码

扫码加入学术交流群,获取更多资源