论文标题
几代人的财富动态:分析和干预措施
Wealth Dynamics Over Generations: Analysis and Interventions
论文作者
论文摘要
我们提出了一种风格化的模型,该模型具有反馈回路,以促进几代人的人口财富的发展。个人具有人才和财富:人才是一个为每个人分布的随机变量,但是财富是一个随机变量,它取决于人的诞生。然后,个人申请下游代理,我们在整个论文中将其视为一所大学(但也可以代表雇主),他决定是否承认他们。该大学不是直接观察人才或财富,而是一个信号(例如标准化测试),这是两者的凸组合。大学知道绘制个人类型和财富的分布,并根据申请人特征的后验分布来做出决定,这是其人口和信号的条件。然后,每个人口在下一轮的财富分配取决于大学在上一轮所接受的人口的比例。 我们研究了该模型中的财富动态,并给出了动态具有一个吸引人的固定点的条件(这意味着人口财富不平等是短暂的),并且它可以具有多个吸引人的固定点(这意味着人口财富不平等可能会持续存在)。在有多个吸引人的固定点的情况下,我们研究了旨在消除或减轻不平等的干预措施,包括增加大学承认更多人的能力,使具有大学偏好的个人产生的信号,并直接将货币转移者与较不富裕的人群进行直接货币转移。
We present a stylized model with feedback loops for the evolution of a population's wealth over generations. Individuals have both talent and wealth: talent is a random variable distributed identically for everyone, but wealth is a random variable that is dependent on the population one is born into. Individuals then apply to a downstream agent, which we treat as a university throughout the paper (but could also represent an employer) who makes a decision about whether to admit them or not. The university does not directly observe talent or wealth, but rather a signal (representing e.g. a standardized test) that is a convex combination of both. The university knows the distributions from which an individual's type and wealth are drawn, and makes its decisions based on the posterior distribution of the applicant's characteristics conditional on their population and signal. Each population's wealth distribution at the next round then depends on the fraction of that population that was admitted by the university at the previous round. We study wealth dynamics in this model, and give conditions under which the dynamics have a single attracting fixed point (which implies population wealth inequality is transitory), and conditions under which it can have multiple attracting fixed points (which implies that population wealth inequality can be persistent). In the case in which there are multiple attracting fixed points, we study interventions aimed at eliminating or mitigating inequality, including increasing the capacity of the university to admit more people, aligning the signal generated by individuals with the preferences of the university, and making direct monetary transfers to the less wealthy population.