论文标题
AU MIC碎屑磁盘中的多波长垂直结构:碰撞级联
Multiwavelength Vertical Structure in the AU Mic Debris Disk: Characterizing the Collisional Cascade
论文作者
论文摘要
碎屑磁盘是kuiper带的缩放类似物,其中粉尘是通过行星模拟之间的碰撞而产生的。在碎屑磁盘的“碰撞级联”模型中,尘埃不断地通过磨削行星之间的碰撞来补充辐射压力和风。该模型假设碰撞具有破坏性,并且涉及较大的速度。该假设尚未超过我们的太阳系。我们提出0“ 25($ \ $ \ $ 2.4 au)的分辨率观察结果,对附近的碎屑盘排放到附近的碎屑盘排放,并与Atacama大型毫米/亚毫米阵列一起发出附近的碎屑盘。参数;我们将磁盘的结构符合我们的数据和档案$λ= 1.3 $ mm的数据(Daley etal。2019),从中,我们从1.3 mm处获得了两个纵横比测量值($ H_ {1300} $ = 0.025 0.019 $^{+0.006} _ { - 0.001} $)以及晶粒尺寸分布索引$ q = $ 3.03 $ \ pm $ 0.02。 AU MIC碎屑磁盘表明,与较大的身体相比,较小的物体更容易被碰撞,这与通常假定的这种差异的强度状态不一致。
Debris disks are scaled-up analogs of the Kuiper Belt in which dust is generated by collisions between planetesimals. In the "collisional cascade" model of debris disks, dust lost to radiation pressure and winds is constantly replenished by grinding collisions between planetesimals. The model assumes that collisions are destructive and involve large velocities; this assumption has not been tested beyond our Solar System. We present 0"25 ($\approx$2.4 au) resolution observations of the $λ$ = 450 $μ$m dust continuum emission from the debris disk around the nearby M dwarf AU Microscopii with the Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array. We use parametric models to describe the disk structure, and an MCMC algorithm to explore the posterior distributions of the model parameters; we fit the structure of the disk to both our data and archival $λ= 1.3$ mm data (Daley et al. 2019), from which we obtain two aspect ratio measurements at 1.3 mm ($h_{1300}$ = 0.025$^{+0.008}_{-0.002}$) and at 450 $μ$m ($h_{450}$ = 0.019$^{+0.006}_{-0.001}$), as well as the grain size distribution index $q =$ 3.03 $\pm$ 0.02. Contextualizing our aspect ratio measurements within the modeling framework laid out in Pan & Schlichting (2012), we derive a power law index of velocity dispersion as a function of grain size $p = 0.28 \pm 0.06$ for the AU Mic debris disk. This result implies that smaller bodies are more easily disrupted than larger bodies by collisions, which is inconsistent with the strength regime usually assumed for such small bodies. Possible explanations for this discrepancy are discussed.