论文标题
对手统计和对MLB的应用的普遍行为
Universal Behavior of Opponent Statistics and Applications to the MLB
论文作者
论文摘要
在大多数受欢迎的体育联赛中,例如美国职业棒球大联盟,NBA和NFL,没有一个常用的统计数据考虑到球员面对的对手的优势。造成这种情况的主要原因之一是传统的信念,即在一个赛季中,球员的运气往往会均匀。另一个主要原因是难以找到一种明智的算法来量化对手的优势,并将这种量化纳入玩家统计数据的重新规定。 在本文中,我们首先认为某些统计数据,例如获得的跑步平均值(ERA)或野外独立投球(FIP)可能会被MLB中的对手的优势大大歪曲。然后,我们以FIP为主要示例提出了一种算法来重新归一致的统计量。这是通过观察到MLB中所有30支球队的某些对手统计数据(例如,每个游戏对手在一个赛季中收集的FIP值的收集)遵循普遍分布,直至扩展和转移。 这使我们能够为假设的平均团队建立数据集,并基于FIP开发投球统计量,该统计量通过基于设备等值的方法来说明投手时间表的强度。它被称为AFIP,它可以衡量投手每次投球时都面对联盟平均进攻球队的FIP的速度。 我们发现,在2019赛季的某些投手和其他赛季的AFIP和FIP之间存在显着差异,从而增加了一种新工具进行玩家评估。这可以使数百万美元的球员合同和团队利润差异,因为他们提高了他们使球员获取的准确性。我们观察到的普遍分布在整个体育界也有许多未来的应用。
In most popular sports leagues, like the MLB, NBA, and NFL, none of the commonly used statistics take into account the strengths of the opponents a player faces. One of the main reasons for this is the conventional belief that a player's luck tends to even out over the course of a season. The other main reason is the difficulties of finding a sensible algorithm to both quantify the strengths of the opponents and incorporate such quantifications into a renormalization of a player's statistics. In this paper, we first argue that certain statistics, such as Earned Run Average (ERA) or Fielding Independent Pitching (FIP) can be significantly skewed by opponents' strengths in the MLB. We then present an algorithm to renormalize such statistics, using FIP as the main example. This is achieved by observing that certain opponent statistics for all 30 teams in the MLB (e.g. the collection of each game's opponent FIP value over the course of a season) follow a universal distribution, up to scaling and shift. This enables us to establish a data set for a hypothetical average team and to develop a pitching statistic based on FIP which accounts for the strength of a pitcher's schedule through methods based on equipercentile equating. It is called aFIP, which measures what a pitcher's FIP would have been if he had faced a league-average offensive team every time he pitched. We find that there is a significant difference between aFIP and FIP for some pitchers during the 2019 season and other seasons as well, adding a new tool for player evaluation. This could make millions of dollars of difference in player contracts and in profits for teams as they enhance the accuracy with which they make player acquisitions. The universal distribution we observed also has many possible future applications throughout the sports world.