论文标题
分散的在线社交网络中的内容隐私执法模型:游戏状态,解决方案,限制和未来方向
Content Privacy Enforcement Models in Decentralized Online Social Networks: State of Play, Solutions, Limitations, and Future Directions
论文作者
论文摘要
近年来,分散的在线社交网络(DOSN)吸引了许多用户的注意,因为它们降低了服务提供商的审查,监视和信息泄漏的风险。与最受欢迎的在线社交网络相反,这些网络基于集中式建筑(例如Facebook,Twitter或Instagram),DOSNS并非基于单个服务提供商作为中央权威。实际上,DOSN上发布的内容存储在其用户提供的设备上,该设备合作以执行提供服务所需的任务。为了不断保证其可用性,用户发布的内容可以存储在其他用户的设备上,仅仅是因为他们在需要时在线。因此,必须通过DOSN基础架构对此类内容进行适当的保护,以确保只有获得发布者许可的用户才能真正访问它们。结果,DOSN需要有效的解决方案来保护每个用户针对社交网络其他用户发布的内容的隐私。在本文中,我们调查并比较了当前DOSN采用的主要内容隐私执法模型,以评估其适用性,以支持基于用户组的不同类型的隐私政策。通过实施多种模型并比较在组上执行的典型操作,即内容发布,用户加入和离开的典型操作来进行此类评估。此外,我们还强调了当前方法的局限性并显示了未来的研究方向。这项贡献除了自己有趣之外,还为有兴趣实施DOSN的研究人员和从业者提供了蓝图,并突出了一些开放的研究指示。
In recent years, Decentralized Online Social Networks (DOSNs) have been attracting the attention of many users because they reduce the risk of censorship, surveillance, and information leakage from the service provider. In contrast to the most popular Online Social Networks, which are based on centralized architectures (e.g., Facebook, Twitter, or Instagram), DOSNs are not based on a single service provider acting as a central authority. Indeed, the contents that are published on DOSNs are stored on the devices made available by their users, which cooperate to execute the tasks needed to provide the service. To continuously guarantee their availability, the contents published by a user could be stored on the devices of other users, simply because they are online when required. Consequently, such contents must be properly protected by the DOSN infrastructure, in order to ensure that they can be really accessed only by users who have the permission of the publishers. As a consequence, DOSNs require efficient solutions for protecting the privacy of the contents published by each user with respect to the other users of the social network. In this paper, we investigate and compare the principal content privacy enforcement models adopted by current DOSNs evaluating their suitability to support different types of privacy policies based on user groups. Such evaluation is carried out by implementing several models and comparing their performance for the typical operations performed on groups, i.e., content publish, user join and leave. Further, we also highlight the limitations of current approaches and show future research directions. This contribution, other than being interesting on its own, provides a blueprint for researchers and practitioners interested in implementing DOSNs, and also highlights a few open research directions.