论文标题
星系群集压力概谱的演变和质量依赖性在0.05 $ \ le z \ le $ 0.60和$ 4 \ times 10^{14} $ m $ _ {\ odot} $ \ $ $ \ le \ le \ le \ le \ textrm {m}
The Evolution and Mass Dependence of Galaxy Cluster Pressure Profiles at 0.05 $\le z \le$ 0.60 and $4 \times 10^{14}$ M$_{\odot}$ $\le \textrm{M}_{500} \le 30 \times 10^{14}$ M$_{\odot}$
论文作者
论文摘要
我们已经将Chandra的X射线观察与Sunyaev-Zel'Dovich(SZ)效应数据结合在一起,来自Planck和Bolocam的效果数据,以测量从0.03r $ _ {500} $ _ {500} $ _ {500} $ \ le $ \ le $ \ le $ r $ r $ r $ \ l $ 5r $ 5r $ _ {500} $ a $ g $ galax $ clanax $ clalaxy cllaxy cllaxy cllaxy cllaxy cllaxy cllaxy clan clan clanift的群集中压力。 z \ rangle = 0.08 $和中间的质量$ \ langle \ textrm {m} _ {500} \ rangle = 6.1 \ times 10^{14} $ m $ _ {\ odot} $,以及$ \ langle z \ langle z \ langle z \ lang lang lang langle&\ lang langle&\ lang langle&\ lang&\ lang&\ lang&range \ textrm {m} _ {500} \ rangle = 10.6 \ times 10^{14} $ m $ _ {\ odot} $。在小半径上,低$ z $样品中的平均缩放压力较低,在大半径上较高,这一趋势在300模拟的类似选择的样品中准确地复制。这种差异似乎主要是由于小半径处的动力学状态,中间半径的进化以及大半径上的进化和质量依赖性的组合。此外,由于质量积聚率的差异和反馈机制的分数影响,与低$ z $样本相比,低$ z $样本中平均缩放压力曲线的总体平坦平坦与期望一致。与先前的研究一致,平均缩放压力曲线的分数散布至少达到$ \ simeq 20 $ 20 $ _ {500} $。在所有半径的低$ z $和中间$ z $样本之间,这种散射是一致的,这表明它不会受到样本选择的强烈影响,并且在300模拟中复制了这种一般行为。最后,提供了近似描述平均压力谱图中质量和红移趋势的分析函数。
We have combined X-ray observations from Chandra with Sunyaev-Zel'dovich (SZ) effect data from Planck and Bolocam to measure intra-cluster medium pressure profiles from 0.03R$_{500}$ $\le$ R $\le$ 5R$_{500}$ for a sample of 21 low-$z$ galaxy clusters with a median redshift $\langle z \rangle = 0.08$ and a median mass $\langle \textrm{M}_{500} \rangle = 6.1 \times 10^{14}$ M$_{\odot}$ and a sample of 19 mid-$z$ galaxy clusters with $\langle z \rangle = 0.50$ and $\langle \textrm{M}_{500} \rangle = 10.6 \times 10^{14}$ M$_{\odot}$. The mean scaled pressure in the low-$z$ sample is lower at small radii and higher at large radii, a trend that is accurately reproduced in similarly selected samples from The300 simulations. This difference appears to be primarily due to dynamical state at small radii, evolution at intermediate radii, and a combination of evolution and mass dependence at large radii. Furthermore, the overall flattening of the mean scaled pressure profile in the low-$z$ sample compared to the mid-$z$ sample is consistent with expectations due to differences in mass accretion rate and the fractional impact of feedback mechanisms. In agreement with previous studies, the fractional scatter about the mean scaled pressure profile reaches a minimum of $\simeq 20$ per cent near 0.5R$_{500}$. This scatter is consistent between the low-$z$ and mid-$z$ samples at all radii, suggesting it is not strongly impacted by sample selection, and this general behavior is reproduced in The300 simulations. Finally, analytic functions that approximately describe the mass and redshift trends in mean pressure profile shape are provided.