论文标题
意大利国家肿瘤学中心的扫描离子束的剂量委托和质量保证
Dosimetric commissioning and quality assurance of scanned ion beams at the Italian National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy
论文作者
论文摘要
目的:描述在意大利国家肿瘤医学癌症中心的主动扫描质子和碳离子束的剂量调试和质量保证(QA)。方法:用PTW Peakfinder(一个可变的深度水柱)获取侧向积分的深度剂量分布(IDD),配备了两个Bragg峰电离室。 Fluka MC代码用于生成能量库,水中的IDD和碳梁的碎片光谱。 EBT3膜用于点尺寸测量,扫描场上的梁位置以及2D场中的均匀性。使用农民型和先进的马克斯电离室以每吨颗粒的数量进行梁监视器校准。梁监视器校准曲线的束位置,在散布峰峰的中心的剂量稳定性,2D场中的剂量均匀性,扫描场上的梁能量,点尺寸,点尺寸和斑点位置都在每天检查质子和碳离子和所有光束线的日常基础。结果:模拟的IDD与测量的实验曲线非常一致。质子的铅笔梁的测得的铅笔梁的FWHM为0.7至2.2 cm。对于碳离子,可用两组斑点大小:0.4至0.8厘米(较小)和0.8至1.1 cm(对于较大的)。在整个20x20 CM2扫描场上,现场位置在+/- 1毫米之内;在任何能量下,两种粒子类型的均匀平方场中的同质性均在+/- 5%之内。质量检查结果超过公差水平。在报告期间,机器停机时间约为6%,其中4.5%是由于计划的维护关闭。结论:在成功的剂量束调试之后,在24个月期间进行的质量保证测量结果表明非常稳定的光束特性。
Purpose: To describe the dosimetric commissioning and quality assurance (QA) of the actively scanned proton and carbon ion beams at the Italian National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy. Methods: The laterally integrated depth-dose-distributions (IDDs) were acquired with the PTW Peakfinder, a variable depth water column, equipped with two Bragg peak ionization chambers. FLUKA MC code was used to generate the energy libraries, the IDDs in water, and the fragment spectra for carbon beams. EBT3 films were used for spot size measurements, beam position over the scan field, and homogeneity in 2D-fields. Beam monitor calibration was performed in terms of number of particles per MU using both a Farmer-type and an Advanced Markus ionization chamber. The beam position at the isocenter, beam monitor calibration curve, dose constancy in the center of the spread-out-Bragg-peak, dose homogeneity in 2D-fields, beam energy, spot size, and spot position over the scan field are all checked on a daily basis for both protons and carbon ions and on all beam lines. Results: The simulated IDDs showed an excellent agreement with the measured experimental curves. The measured FWHM of the pencil beam in air at the isocenter was from 0.7 to 2.2 cm for protons. For carbon ions, two sets of spot size are available: from 0.4 to 0.8 cm (for the smaller) and from 0.8 to 1.1 cm (for the larger one). The spot position was within +/-1 mm over the whole 20x20 cm2 scan field; homogeneity in a uniform squared field was within +/-5% for both particle types at any energy. QA results exceeding tolerance levels were rarely found. In the reporting period, the machine downtime was around 6%, of which 4.5% was due to planned maintenance shutdowns. Conclusions: After successful dosimetric beam commissioning, quality assurance measurements performed during a 24-month period show very stable beam characteristics.