论文标题
一阶逻辑的纤维通用代数
Fibered Universal Algebra for First-Order Logics
论文作者
论文摘要
我们扩展了律师 - 皮特斯支柱类别(又称超核),以开发一个通用框架,用于为非经典一阶逻辑提供“代数”语义。该框架包括自然的替代概念,允许将一阶逻辑视为结构封闭操作员,就像命题逻辑在抽象的代数逻辑中一样。然后,我们建立了从通用代数的同态定理的扩展,用于普遍的支撑类别类别,并在Prop类别语义上表征了两个自然闭合算子。第一个结束了一类结构(解释为撑杆类别的形态),在其共同的一阶理论的满意下,第二阶结构在其相关的一阶后果下关闭了一类Prop类别。事实证明,这些封闭操作员的特征非常反映了伯克霍夫(Birkhoff)在其共同的方程理论满意的满意下对一类代数的封闭的特征,而布洛克(Bloks)和乔恩斯森(Jónsson)在方程式后果下的闭合表征分别。一阶闭合操作员的这些“代数”表征是支撑型语义的独特之处,并且在经典一阶逻辑的Tarskian语义中没有类似物。我们认为的支柱类别比传统的直觉撑杆类别或三脂要多得多(即代表索引的部分有序集的托普斯)。尽管如此,据我们所知,即使仅限这些特殊类型的支撑类别类别,我们的结果仍然是新的。
We extend Lawvere-Pitts prop-categories (aka. hyperdoctrines) to develop a general framework for providing "algebraic" semantics for nonclassical first-order logics. This framework includes a natural notion of substitution, which allows first-order logics to be considered as structural closure operators just as propositional logics are in abstract algebraic logic. We then establish an extension of the homomorphism theorem from universal algebra for generalized prop-categories and characterize two natural closure operators on the prop-categorical semantics. The first closes a class of structures (which are interpreted as morphisms of prop-categories) under the satisfaction of their common first-order theory and the second closes a class of prop-categories under their associated first-order consequence. It turns out these closure operators have characterizations that closely mirror Birkhoff's characterization of the closure of a class of algebras under the satisfaction of their common equational theory and Blok and Jónsson's characterization of closure under equational consequence, respectively. These "algebraic" characterizations of the first-order closure operators are unique to the prop-categorical semantics and do not have analogs, for example, in the Tarskian semantics for classical first-order logic. The prop-categories we consider are much more general than traditional intuitionistic prop-categories or triposes (i.e., topos representing indexed partially ordered sets). Nonetheless, to our knowledge, our results are still new even when restricted to these special classes of prop-categories.