论文标题
基于AI的自动化语音治疗工具针对有声音障碍的人:系统文献评论
AI-Based Automated Speech Therapy Tools for persons with Speech Sound Disorders: A Systematic Literature Review
论文作者
论文摘要
本文介绍了有关言语障碍患者(SSD)的基于AI的自动化语音疗法工具的已发表研究的系统文献综述。 COVID-19大流行已经为患有SSD患者的自动化语音治疗工具启动了要求,使语音疗法可访问和负担得起。但是,与人类专家相比,没有针对设计此类自动化工具及其所需自动化程度的准则。在这项系统的综述中,我们遵循PRISMA框架来解决四个研究问题:1)哪种类型的SSD类型的基于AI的自动化语音疗法工具地址:2)此类工具所达到的自治水平是多少,3)与人类专家相比,这种不同的干预方式是什么。在数字库中进行了广泛的搜索,以查找与我们2007年至2022年我们的研究相关的研究论文。结果表明,针对SSD患者的基于AI的自动化语音疗法工具在研究人员中越来越引起人们的关注。根据审查的论文,发音障碍是最常见的SSD。此外,我们的分析表明,大多数研究人员提出了完全自动化的工具,而没有考虑其他利益相关者的作用。我们的审查表明,基于移动的和游戏的应用程序是最常见的干预方式。结果进一步表明,只有少数研究将这种工具的有效性与专家言语病理学家(SLP)进行了比较。我们的论文介绍了该领域的最先进,根据研究问题为重大见解提供了重要的见解,并为未来的研究方向提供了建议。
This paper presents a systematic literature review of published studies on AI-based automated speech therapy tools for persons with speech sound disorders (SSD). The COVID-19 pandemic has initiated the requirement for automated speech therapy tools for persons with SSD making speech therapy accessible and affordable. However, there are no guidelines for designing such automated tools and their required degree of automation compared to human experts. In this systematic review, we followed the PRISMA framework to address four research questions: 1) what types of SSD do AI-based automated speech therapy tools address, 2) what is the level of autonomy achieved by such tools, 3) what are the different modes of intervention, and 4) how effective are such tools in comparison with human experts. An extensive search was conducted on digital libraries to find research papers relevant to our study from 2007 to 2022. The results show that AI-based automated speech therapy tools for persons with SSD are increasingly gaining attention among researchers. Articulation disorders were the most frequently addressed SSD based on the reviewed papers. Further, our analysis shows that most researchers proposed fully automated tools without considering the role of other stakeholders. Our review indicates that mobile-based and gamified applications were the most frequent mode of intervention. The results further show that only a few studies compared the effectiveness of such tools compared to expert Speech-Language Pathologists (SLP). Our paper presents the state-of-the-art in the field, contributes significant insights based on the research questions, and provides suggestions for future research directions.