论文标题
综述基于完整波形的最佳运输距离进行高分辨率地震成像
A review of the use of optimal transport distances for high resolution seismic imaging based on the full waveform
论文作者
论文摘要
我们考虑称为全波倒置(FWI)的高分辨率地震成像方法。 FWI是一种数据拟合方法,旨在反转地下机械参数。尽管学术和工业社区对FWI进行了大量采用,并且许多成功的结果仍然受到严重限制。从数学的角度来看,FWI是一个大规模的PDE受限优化问题。使用的不合适函数是非conevex,它测量观察到的地震数据和通过解决方案计算出的数据之间的差异。离散化后,FWI问题的大小需要使用局部优化求解器,这些求解求解器容易收敛到局部最小值。因此,FWI的成功在很大程度上取决于选择初始模型的选择,以确保融合与不合适函数的全局最小值。 这种限制一直是各种策略的动力。在已经研究的不同方法中,最近促进了基于最佳运输(OT)距离的不合适函数。领先的思想是从扩张和翻译方面的固有凸度中受益,从而使FWI问题更多地凸。但是,由于签署地震数据,因此在FWI框架中应用OT距离并不直接,而已经开发了OT来比较概率度量。 这项研究的目的是审查为克服这一困难而开发的两种方法。两者都成功地应用于工业框架中的现场数据。两者都可以更好地利用地震数据,减轻对初始模型和各种常规工作流程的敏感性,并降低地下机械参数倒置的不确定性。
We consider the high-resolution seismic imaging method called full-waveform inversion (FWI). FWI is a data fitting method aimed at inverting for subsurface mechanical parameters. Despite the large adoption of FWI by the academic and industrial communities, and many successful results, FWI still suffers from severe limitations. From a mathematical standpoint, FWI is a large scale PDE-constrained optimization problem. The misfit function that is used, which measures the discrepancy between observed seismic data and data calculated through the solution of a wave propagation problem, is non-convex. After discretization, the size of the FWI problem requires the use of local optimization solvers, which are prone to converge towards local minima. Thus the success of FWI strongly depends on the choice of the initial model to ensure the convergence towards the global minimum of the misfit function. This limitation has been the motivation for a large variety of strategies. Among the different methods that have been investigated, the use of optimal transport (OT) distances-based misfit functions has been recently promoted. The leading idea is to benefit from the inherent convexity of OT distances with respect to dilation and translation to render the FWI problem more convex. However, the application of OT distances in the framework of FWI is not straightforward, as seismic data is signed, while OT has been developed for the comparison of probability measures. The purpose of this study is to review two methods that were developed to overcome this difficulty. Both have been successfully applied to field data in an industrial framework. Both make it possible to better exploit the seismic data, alleviating the sensitivity to the initial model and to various conventional workflow steps, and reducing the uncertainty attached to the subsurface mechanical parameters inversion.