论文标题
粒子跟踪问题中的动态超分辨率
Dynamic super-resolution in particle tracking problems
论文作者
论文摘要
生物成像中的粒子跟踪与重建靶粒子的轨迹,位置或速度有关。粒子跟踪的标准方法由两个步骤组成:首先在每个时间步骤中静态地重建源位置,然后第二次应用跟踪技术来获得轨迹和速度。相比之下,动态重建旨在同时从具有某些优势的所有框架中恢复源位置和速度。在本文中,我们通过一般的粒子跟踪问题中的一般动态重建来对重建源编号,位置和速度的分辨率限制提供严格的数学分析,通过该分辨率,我们证明了实现动态重建的超级分辨率的可能性。我们表明,当颗粒的位置速度对超出某些距离(分辨率限制)时,粒子的数量和位置速度对可以稳定地恢复。分辨率限制与成像系统的截止频率,信噪比和源的稀疏性有关。根据这些估计,我们还得出了促进稀疏性动态重建的稳定性结果。此外,我们进一步表明,速度的重建具有更好的分辨率极限,随着颗粒移动而不断改进。通过观察到,该结果得出的结果是,速度恢复的固有截止频率可以看作是总观察时间乘以成像系统的截止频率,与每个衍射受限框架相比,这可能会导致更好的分辨率限制。可以预料,这种观察可以激发新的重建算法,从而改善实践中粒子跟踪的分辨率。
Particle tracking in biological imaging is concerned with reconstructing the trajectories, locations, or velocities of the targeting particles. The standard approach of particle tracking consists of two steps: first reconstructing statically the source locations in each time step, and second applying tracking techniques to obtain the trajectories and velocities. In contrast, the dynamic reconstruction seeks to simultaneously recover the source locations and velocities from all frames, which enjoys certain advantages. In this paper, we provide a rigorous mathematical analysis for the resolution limit of reconstructing source number, locations, and velocities by general dynamical reconstruction in particle tracking problems, by which we demonstrate the possibility of achieving super-resolution for the dynamic reconstruction. We show that when the location-velocity pairs of the particles are separated beyond certain distances (the resolution limits), the number of particles and the location-velocity pair can be stably recovered. The resolution limits are related to the cut-off frequency of the imaging system, signal-to-noise ratio, and the sparsity of the source. By these estimates, we also derive a stability result for a sparsity-promoting dynamic reconstruction. In addition, we further show that the reconstruction of velocities has a better resolution limit which improves constantly as the particles moving. This result is derived by an observation that the inherent cut-off frequency for the velocity recovery can be viewed as the total observation time multiplies the cut-off frequency of the imaging system, which may lead to a better resolution limit as compared to the one for each diffraction-limited frame. It is anticipated that this observation can inspire new reconstruction algorithms that improve the resolution of particle tracking in practice.