论文标题
立体声A和风在55 $^\ circular $ Ancular Eaplation观察到的冠状质量弹出和磁性喷射
A Coronal Mass Ejection and Magnetic Ejecta Observed In Situ by STEREO-A and Wind at 55$^\circ$ Angular Separation
论文作者
论文摘要
我们介绍了{\ it原位}的分析和对冠状质量弹射(CME)的遥感测量,该测量于2月20日爆发,并影响了太阳陆地关系天文台(立体)-A和{\ IT Wind} SpaceCraft,均分离为55 $^$^$^$^$^$^$^$^$。两种航天器的2月24日在2021年的测量与磁性喷射(ME)的通过一致,这使得这是报告的最广泛的多翼 - 空间ME检测结果之一。 CME与太阳南半球的低分和宽细丝爆发有关,该爆发在E34周围的立体声A和{\ it风}之间传播。在Stereo-A上,测量结果表明了中等快速的通过($ \ sim 425 $ 〜km \,s $^{ - 1} $)震动 - 驱动我,发生在高速流结束后2--3天(HSS)。在{\ it wind}处,测量结果显示出更快的速度($ \ sim 490 $ 〜km \,s $^{ - 1} $),并且我短得多,在HSS的后部内没有震动或鞘内。在两个航天器上测量的ME方向与弯曲通量绳的腿靠近的通道一致。在{\ it风}观察到的ME的短持续时间以及两个航天器之间的超颗粒螺距角度数据的差异是唯一不满足共同期望的结果。我们讨论了这些测量值对我们对CME形状和程度的理解以及CME与HSS之间相互作用的明确签名的结果。
We present an analysis of {\it in situ} and remote-sensing measurements of a coronal mass ejection (CME) that erupted on 2021 February 20 and impacted both the Solar TErrestrial RElations Observatory (STEREO)-A and the {\it Wind} spacecraft, which were separated longitudinally by 55$^\circ$. Measurements on 2021 February 24 at both spacecraft are consistent with the passage of a magnetic ejecta (ME), making this one of the widest reported multi-spacecraft ME detections. The CME is associated with a low-inclined and wide filament eruption from the Sun's southern hemisphere, which propagates between STEREO-A and {\it Wind} around E34. At STEREO-A, the measurements indicate the passage of a moderately fast ($\sim 425$~km\,s$^{-1}$) shock-driving ME, occurring 2--3 days after the end of a high speed stream (HSS). At {\it Wind}, the measurements show a faster ($\sim 490$~km\,s$^{-1}$) and much shorter ME, not preceded by a shock nor a sheath, and occurring inside the back portion of the HSS. The ME orientation measured at both spacecraft is consistent with a passage close to the legs of a curved flux rope. The short duration of the ME observed at {\it Wind} and the difference in the suprathermal electron pitch-angle data between the two spacecraft are the only results that do not satisfy common expectations. We discuss the consequence of these measurements on our understanding of the CME shape and extent and the lack of clear signatures of the interaction between the CME and the HSS.