论文标题
评估与脑内电刺激同时记录的脑电图和SEEG的体内电导率估计的性能
Evaluation of Performance for Human In-Vivo Conductivity Estimation from EEG and sEEG Recorded in Simultaneous with Intracerebral Electrical Stimulation
论文作者
论文摘要
在人头模型中分配准确的电导率值是执行精确脑电图(EEG)源定位和靶向经颅电刺激(TES)的基本因素。不幸的是,文献报告说,人头中不同组织的电导率不同。当前的研究首先分析了有关电源和测量的不同配置的体内电导率估计的性能。然后,它使用头皮脑电图和脑静脉内静脉内脑电图(SEEG)同时介绍了三名癫痫患者的电导率估计值。电导率的估计值是基于人头的有限元模型,该模型具有五个均匀和各向同性电导率的组织室。这项研究的结果表明,在考虑不同的刺激位置,不同的测量位置或不同的测量方式(SEEG或EEG)时,体内电导率估计可能会导致同一患者的不同估计电导率。这项工作为体内电导率估计提供了重要的指南,并解释了先前研究中报道的电导率值之间的变异性。
Assigning accurate conductivity values in human head models is an essential factor for performing precise electroencephalographic (EEG) source localization and targeting of transcranial electrical stimulation (TES). Unfortunately, the literature reports diverging conductivity values of the different tissues in the human head. The current study analyzes first the performance of in-vivo conductivity estimation for different configurations concerning the localization of the electrical source and measurement. Then, it presents conductivity estimates for three epileptic patients using scalp EEG and intracerebral stereotactic EEG (sEEG) acquired in simultaneous with intracerebral electrical stimulation. The estimates of the conductivities were based on finite-element models of the human head with five tissue compartments of homogeneous and isotropic conductivities. The results of this study show that in-vivo conductivity estimation can lead to different estimated conductivities for the same patient when considering different stimulation positions, different measurement positions or different measurement modalities (sEEG or EEG). This work provides important guidelines to in-vivo conductivity estimation and explains the variability among the conductivity values which have been reported in previous studies.