论文标题
使用通用分类器的脊髓损伤参与者中与错误相关电位的在线异步检测
Online asynchronous detection of error-related potentials in participants with a spinal cord injury using a generic classifier
论文作者
论文摘要
BCI用户对错误的认识与名为错误相关电位(ERRP)的皮质签名相关联。 BCIS中ERRP的检测的结合可以提高BCIS的性能。这项工作是三重的。首先,我们研究ERRP分类器是否可以从健全的参与者转移到患有脊髓损伤(SCI)的参与者。其次,我们在没有离线校准的在线实验中测试了使用SCI和控制参与者的通用ERRP分类器。第三,我们研究了两组参与者中错误的形态。我们使用了先前记录的脑电图(EEG)数据,来自健全的参与者来培训ERRP分类器。我们在与16名新参与者的在线实验中对分类器进行了异步测试:有8位具有SCI和8位健壮的对照参与者的参与者。该实验没有离线校准,参与者从一开始就收到了有关错误检测的反馈。通用分类器未接受用户的大脑信号培训。尽管如此,它的性能还是在使用个性化决策阈值的在线实验期间进行了优化。具有SCI的参与者呈现出非遗传性ERRP形态,其中四个没有呈现明确的ERRP信号。通用分类器在具有清晰的ERRP信号的参与者中执行的机会级别以上是SCI(16名参与者中的11个)。在使用通用分类器的五个参与者中,有三位参与者不会从使用个性化分类器中受益。这项工作表明,在没有离线校准的在线实验中,将ERRP分类器从健全的参与者转移到患有SCI的参与者的可行性,以便在线实验中检测错误,这为用户提供了直接的反馈。
A BCI user awareness of an error is associated with a cortical signature named error-related potential (ErrP). The incorporation of ErrPs' detection in BCIs can improve BCIs' performance. This work is three-folded. First, we investigate if an ErrP classifier is transferable from able-bodied participants to participants with spinal cord injury (SCI). Second, we test this generic ErrP classifier with SCI and control participants, in an online experiment without offline calibration. Third, we investigate the morphology of ErrPs in both groups of participants. We used previously recorded electroencephalographic (EEG) data from able-bodied participants to train an ErrP classifier. We tested the classifier asynchronously, in an online experiment with 16 new participants: 8 participants with SCI and 8 able-bodied control participants. The experiment had no offline calibration and participants received feedback regarding the ErrPs' detection from its start. The generic classifier was not trained with the user's brain signals. Still, its performance was optimized during the online experiment with the use of personalized decision thresholds. Participants with SCI presented a non-homogenous ErrP morphology, and four of them did not present clear ErrP signals. The generic classifier performed above chance level in participants with clear ErrP signals, independently of the SCI (11 out of 16 participants). Three out of the five participants that obtained chance level results with the generic classifier would have not benefited from the use of a personalized classifier. This work shows the feasibility of transferring an ErrP classifier from able-bodied participants to participants with SCI, for asynchronous detection of ErrPs in an online experiment without offline calibration, which provided immediate feedback to the users.