论文标题
平面应变液压裂缝的繁殖,该裂缝是一个粗糙的内聚力区域
Propagation of a plane-strain hydraulic fracture accounting for a rough cohesive zone
论文作者
论文摘要
岩石的准脆性性质挑战了线性液压断裂力学(LHFM)的基本假设:线性弹性断裂力学和光滑的平行板润滑流体流动。我们放松这些假设,并研究平面液压骨折在不可渗透的介质中的生长,该培养基占据了粗糙的凝聚区和流体滞后。除了像LHFM情况一样,除了无量纲的韧性以及流体和断裂前部聚结的时间尺度外,该解决方案现在还取决于原位与粘合应力比和由孔径粗糙度引起的流动偏差的强度。该溶液由成核时间尺度适当地描述,该尺度将裂缝生长描绘成成核阶段,中间阶段以及最终会融入LHFM预测的晚期阶段。当流体前沿进入粗糙的内聚区时,就会发生高度非线性的水力机械耦合,该区域本身在成核和中间阶段就会演变。这种耦合导致明显的额外粘性流量耗散。结果,断裂的演化与LHFM溶液的偏离,其裂缝长度较短,宽度较大和净压力。随着滞后和粘性区分数的较小,这些偏差最终会在后期减少。随着较大的无量纲韧性和原位粘性应力比率增加,因为两者都进一步将粘性的粘性位于位于粗糙的粘性区域的流体前部附近。对于深度遇到的原位与粘合应力比的现实值,可能会在很晚的时间内发生收敛。与LHFM预测相比,在实验室实验和简短的原子岩石中,在实验室实验和简短的现场注射中,对凝聚区的影响似乎是突出的。
The quasi-brittle nature of rocks challenges the basic assumptions of linear hydraulic fracture mechanics (LHFM): linear elastic fracture mechanics and smooth parallel plates lubrication fluid flow. We relax these hypotheses and investigate the growth of a plane-strain hydraulic fracture in an impermeable medium accounting for a rough cohesive zone and a fluid lag. In addition to a dimensionless toughness and the time-scale of coalescence of the fluid and fracture fronts as in the LHFM case, the solution now also depends on the in-situ-to-cohesive stress ratio and the intensity of the flow deviation induced by aperture roughness. The solution is appropriately described by a nucleation time-scale, which delineates the fracture growth into a nucleation phase, an intermediate stage and a late time stage where convergence toward LHFM predictions finally occurs. A highly non-linear hydro-mechanical coupling takes place as the fluid front enters the rough cohesive zone which itself evolves during the nucleation and intermediate stages. This coupling leads to significant additional viscous flow dissipation. As a result, the fracture evolution deviates from LHFM solutions with shorter fracture lengths, larger widths and net pressures. These deviations ultimately decrease at late times as the lag and cohesive zone fractions both become smaller. The deviations increase with larger dimensionless toughness and in-situ-to-cohesive stress ratio, as both further localize viscous dissipation near the fluid front located in the rough cohesive zone. The convergence toward LHFM can occur at very late time for realistic values of in-situ-to-cohesive stress ratio encountered at depth. The impact of a rough cohesive zone appears to be prominent for laboratory experiments and short in-situ injections in quasi-brittle rocks with ultimately a larger energy demand compared to LHFM predictions.