论文标题

生态学理论中的数学问题

Mathematical problems in the Theory of ECO

论文作者

Prakash, Chandra

论文摘要

本文需要对管理永恒崩溃对象(ECO)原理的概念的批判性概述。数学分析将被处理以结论生态范式所需的证据,这本质上是临时性的。拒绝黑洞的第一部分详细信息始终考虑形成被困的表面的可能性,因此我们将通过调查“未发生被困的表面”开始工作,然后我们分析了Mitra博士关于$ r = 0 $(内部黑洞)的间接主张,也可以作为另一种坐标。在此之后,对Schwarzschild黑洞的质量为零的说法进行了详细分析,实际上是有效的索赔。本文的主要目的是解决黑洞是否确实存在的核心问题,还是多年来偏见的偏见的结果。本文旨在弥合ECOS和黑洞之间的差距,如果确实存在黑洞,那么我正在审查的论文被强烈否认。这里提供的分析将向我们展示,为什么ECO毫无根据,而不是真正解决黑洞问题的解决方案。

A critical overview of the concepts that govern the principles of the Eternally Collapsing Object (ECO) is entailed in this article. The mathematical analysis will be dealt to conclude the proof required for the ECO paradigm is ad-hoc in nature at best. The first section details in rejecting black holes always considers the possibility of formation of trapped surfaces, so we will begin our work by looking into "non occurrence of trapped surfaces" then we analyze Dr. Mitra's indirect claim regarding how $ R = 0$ (inside black hole) could also be treated as another coordinate singularity. After this a detailed analysis on the claim that the mass of the Schwarzschild black hole being zero is in actuality a valid claim or not. The main aim of this article is address the core issue of whether black holes indeed do exist or is it a consequence of biases that circumvent common sense over the years. This article aims to bridge the gap between ECOs and black holes and if at all black holes do exist, which was vehemently denied by the person whose paper I am reviewing. The analysis presented here will show us, why ECOs are baseless and can not really be the solution to black hole problem.

扫码加入交流群

加入微信交流群

微信交流群二维码

扫码加入学术交流群,获取更多资源