论文标题
这是Pofma吗？在Covid-19电报组聊天中分析公众舆论和错误信息
Is this pofma? Analysing public opinion and misinformation in a COVID-19 Telegram group chat
论文作者
论文摘要
我们分析了一个总部位于新加坡的Covid-19电报小组，有10,000多名参与者。首先，我们随着时间的推移研究小组的意见，重点介绍了四个维度：参与，情感，主题和心理特征。我们发现，当卫生部提高疾病警报水平时，参与度达到了顶峰，但这种参与并未持续。其次，我们在该小组中寻找政府确定的错误信息。我们发现政府认定的错误信息很少，并且讨论这些错误信息的信息表达了怀疑。
We analyse a Singapore-based COVID-19 Telegram group with more than 10,000 participants. First, we study the group's opinion over time, focusing on four dimensions: participation, sentiment, topics, and psychological features. We find that engagement peaked when the Ministry of Health raised the disease alert level, but this engagement was not sustained. Second, we search for government-identified misinformation in the group. We find that government-identified misinformation is rare, and that messages discussing these pieces of misinformation express skepticism.
