论文标题
致力于抛光计算科学
Towards decolonising computational sciences
论文作者
论文摘要
本文阐述了我们关于如何开始非殖民计算领域(例如数据和认知科学)的观点。我们认为这场斗争需要两个基本步骤:a)意识到当今的系统已经继承了,并且仍然颁布,敌对,保守,压迫性的行为和对有色妇女的原则(WOC); b)拒绝居中的想法是解决系统级问题的解决方案。我们忽略这两个步骤的时间越长,我们的学术系统越多地保持其毒性结构,不包括并伤害了黑人妇女和其他少数群体。这也使大门敞开了,诸如优生学和同学等伪造的伪科学。我们建议努力应对我们的田地历史和遗产,这是避免过去错误的关键。例如,诸如“多样性委员会”之类的倡议仍然可能是有害的,因为它们表面上似乎是改革性的,但仍使白人保持白度并保持现状。在许多WOC工作的肩膀上,他们一直在铺平道路,我们希望促进建立基层和自上而下的计算科学重新塑造所需的对话,包括但不限于心理学,神经科学,认知科学,计算机科学,计算机科学,数据科学,统计学,机器学习和人工智能。我们渴望这些领域远离他们停滞不前,性别歧视和种族主义者的过去,共同雕刻和维护一个生态系统,在这些生态系统中,研究人员的多样化人口和科学思想都受到了严重挑战的现状。
This article sets out our perspective on how to begin the journey of decolonising computational fields, such as data and cognitive sciences. We see this struggle as requiring two basic steps: a) realisation that the present-day system has inherited, and still enacts, hostile, conservative, and oppressive behaviours and principles towards women of colour (WoC); and b) rejection of the idea that centering individual people is a solution to system-level problems. The longer we ignore these two steps, the more "our" academic system maintains its toxic structure, excludes, and harms Black women and other minoritised groups. This also keeps the door open to discredited pseudoscience, like eugenics and physiognomy. We propose that grappling with our fields' histories and heritage holds the key to avoiding mistakes of the past. For example, initiatives such as "diversity boards" can still be harmful because they superficially appear reformatory but nonetheless center whiteness and maintain the status quo. Building on the shoulders of many WoC's work, who have been paving the way, we hope to advance the dialogue required to build both a grass-roots and a top-down re-imagining of computational sciences -- including but not limited to psychology, neuroscience, cognitive science, computer science, data science, statistics, machine learning, and artificial intelligence. We aspire for these fields to progress away from their stagnant, sexist, and racist shared past into carving and maintaining an ecosystem where both a diverse demographics of researchers and scientific ideas that critically challenge the status quo are welcomed.