论文标题
ERIS/发育不良系统I:发育不良的轨道
The Eris/Dysnomia system I: The orbit of Dysnomia
论文作者
论文摘要
我们在ERIS/发育不良系统上提出了新的结果,包括对Hubble空间望远镜(HST)上WFC3仪器的新图像的分析。 2018年1月和2月,将七个HST轨道授予了15171计划,在整个轨道期间选择进行样品发育不良的观测之间的间隔。使用ERI和发育不良的相对天文学,我们为发育不良的最佳开普勒轨道计算了最佳的开普勒轨道。根据Keplerian Fit,我们发现轨道周期为15.785899 $ \ pm $ 0.000050天,这与最近的工作非常吻合。我们报告的非零偏心率在6.2- $σ$级别上为0.0062,尽管估计偏心型阻尼时间尺度为$ \ leq $ 17 MYR。考虑到ERIS和发育不良的量,新的系统密度的计算为2.43 $ \ pm $ 0.05 g cm $^{ - 3} $,$ \ sim $ \ sim $ 4%$ 4%,$ 4%的$ 4%,$ 4%,$ \ pm $ 0.05 $ 0.05 g g cm $^cm $^{ - 3} $。新的天体测量值足够高,可以打破轨道极取向的变性,并表明以前的方式表明发育不良轨道。相对于ERIS的HeliePentric轨道飞机的发育不良轨道极的斜率计算为78.29 $ \ pm $ 0.65 $^{\ circ} $,并且与以前的工作一致;下一个共同事件季节将发生在2239年。可以在6.3- $σ$水平上排除调查中考虑的所有数据的开普勒轨道,但是确定偏差的原因不在这项工作的范围之内。
We present new results on the Eris/Dysnomia system including analysis of new images from the WFC3 instrument on the Hubble Space Telescope (HST). Seven HST orbits were awarded to program 15171 in January and February 2018, with the intervals between observations selected to sample Dysnomia over a full orbital period. Using relative astrometry of Eris and Dysnomia, we computed a best-fit Keplerian orbit for Dysnomia. Based on the Keplerian fit, we find an orbital period of 15.785899$\pm$0.000050 days, which is in good agreement with recent work. We report a non-zero eccentricity of 0.0062 at the 6.2-$σ$ level, despite an estimated eccentricity damping timescale of $\leq$17 Myr. Considering the volumes of both Eris and Dysnomia, the new system density was calculated to be 2.43$\pm$0.05 g cm$^{-3}$, a decrease of $\sim$4% from the previous value of 2.52$\pm$0.05 g cm$^{-3}$. The new astrometric measurements were high enough precision to break the degeneracy of the orbit pole orientation, and indicate that Dysnomia orbits in a prograde manner. The obliquity of Dysnomia's orbit pole with respect to the plane of Eris' heliocentric orbit was calculated to be 78.29$\pm$0.65$^{\circ}$ and is in agreement with previous work; the next mutual events season will occur in 2239. The Keplerian orbit fit to all the data considered in this investigation can be excluded at the 6.3-$σ$ level, but identifying the cause of the deviation was outside the scope of this work.