论文标题
对知识史的社交网络的纵向分析
A Longitudinal Analysis of a Social Network of Intellectual History
论文作者
论文摘要
知识分子的历史包括哲学家，科学家，作家，他们的工作和思想的影响和互连的复杂网络。这些影响如何随着时间的流逝而发展？谁是一段时期最有影响力的学者？为了回答这些问题，我们挖掘了从链接的开放数据提供商Yago中提取的12,500多名知识分子的影响网络。我们以纵向的观点丰富了这个网络，并分析了在ERA，INTER-INTER-ER-ERA内部和累积的ERA网络之间区分完整网络的时间分配的预测。因此，我们确定了各种知识分子和时代的模式，并及时研究了它们的发展。我们展示了哪些学者在不同的时代最有影响力，谁扮演着重要的知识经纪人角色。一个必不可少的发现是，一个时代学者的最大影响是对同时代人的影响，并且每个时期的互动影响最大。此外，我们看到定量证据表明，文艺复兴时期没有古代的重新发现，但自中世纪以来一直是不断的接受。
The history of intellectuals consists of a complicated web of influences and interconnections of philosophers, scientists, writers, their work, and ideas. How did these influences evolve over time? Who were the most influential scholars in a period? To answer these questions, we mined a network of influence of over 12,500 intellectuals, extracted from the Linked Open Data provider YAGO. We enriched this network with a longitudinal perspective, and analysed time-sliced projections of the complete network differentiating between within-era, inter-era, and accumulated-era networks. We thus identified various patterns of intellectuals and eras, and studied their development in time. We show which scholars were most influential in different eras, and who took prominent knowledge broker roles. One essential finding is that the highest impact of an era's scholar was on their contemporaries, as well as the inter-era influence of each period was strongest to its consecutive one. Further, we see quantitative evidence that there was no re-discovery of Antiquity during the Renaissance, but a continuous reception since the Middle Ages.
