论文标题
干预主义的调解分析方法
An Interventionist Approach to Mediation Analysis
论文作者
论文摘要
犹太珍珠的见解是,当假定错误时,纯净(又称自然)直接效应(PDE)是非参数通过中介公式识别的,这在不止一种意义上是“破坏路径”!在同一篇论文中,珍珠将思想实验描述为激励PDE的一种方式。对该实验的分析使Robins \&Richardson成为了一种新颖的方式,将干预措施的直接影响概念化在扩展的图表上,其中处理被分解为多个可分离的成分。我们在这里进一步发展了这种新颖的理论,表明它提供了一个独立的框架,用于讨论中介,而无需参考跨世界(嵌套)反事实或介体的干预措施。该理论保留了格式“不操纵不动”,并在未来的随机对照试验中进行了经验测试的问题。即便如此,我们证明了干预主义和嵌套的反事实方法在非参数结构方程模型下仍然紧密耦合,除非存在“凹陷证人”。实际上,我们的分析还导致一种简单的声音和完整的算法,用于确定(非干预主义)路径特异性反事实理论中的识别。
Judea Pearl's insight that, when errors are assumed independent, the Pure (aka Natural) Direct Effect (PDE) is non-parametrically identified via the Mediation Formula was `path-breaking' in more than one sense! In the same paper Pearl described a thought-experiment as a way to motivate the PDE. Analysis of this experiment led Robins \& Richardson to a novel way of conceptualizing direct effects in terms of interventions on an expanded graph in which treatment is decomposed into multiple separable components. We further develop this novel theory here, showing that it provides a self-contained framework for discussing mediation without reference to cross-world (nested) counterfactuals or interventions on the mediator. The theory preserves the dictum `no causation without manipulation' and makes questions of mediation empirically testable in future Randomized Controlled Trials. Even so, we prove the interventionist and nested counterfactual approaches remain tightly coupled under a Non-Parametric Structural Equation Model except in the presence of a `recanting witness.' In fact, our analysis also leads to a simple sound and complete algorithm for determining identification in the (non-interventionist) theory of path-specific counterfactuals.