论文标题

来自X射线观测和模拟的DEBIAS GALAXY簇压力曲线

Debiased Galaxy Cluster Pressure Profiles from X-ray Observations and Simulations

论文作者

He, Yizhou, Mansfield, Philip, Rau, Markus M., Trac, Hy, Battaglia, Nicholas

论文摘要

我们提出了一个平均簇压力曲线的更新模型,该模型通过将X射线观测结果与宇宙学模拟结合起来调整了静液压质量偏差。我们的模型通过将幂律与流体动力模拟中的“真”光环质量和X射线簇质量之间的关系(Illaboristng,Barahamas和MacSIS)中的关系估计。作为一个示例应用程序,我们考虑Rexcess X射线群集样品和源自缩放和堆叠压力曲线的通用压力曲线(UPP)。我们发现调整后的质量,$ m_ \ mathrm {500c},$ \ lyssim $ 15%$ 15%和缩放压力$ p/p_ \ mathrm {500c} $,其$ \ lyssim $ 35%$ 35%比以前推断出的均低35%。我们的脱氧压力曲线(DPP)非常适合纳瓦罗 - 弗朗基 - 白色(GNFW)功能,具有参数$ [p_0,c_ {500},α,β,γ] = [5.048,1.217.217,1.1.192,192,5.490.490.433] $ cription cription cription tripcection。当使用DPP对Sunyaev-Zel'Dovich(SZ)效应进行建模时,我们发现集成的Compton $ Y-M $关系仅与自相似缩放相比较小。假设标称宇宙学参数(例如$ω__\ text {m} = 0.3 $,$σ_8= 0.8 $),振幅的热SZ角功率谱的幅度较低约30%,并且与最近的PLANCK结果一致,而无需额外的偏见校正。

We present an updated model for the average cluster pressure profile, adjusted for hydrostatic mass bias by combining results from X-ray observations with cosmological simulations. Our model estimates this bias by fitting a power-law to the relation between the "true" halo mass and X-ray cluster mass in hydrodynamic simulations (IllustrisTNG, BAHAMAS, and MACSIS). As an example application, we consider the REXCESS X-ray cluster sample and the Universal Pressure Profile (UPP) derived from scaled and stacked pressure profiles. We find adjusted masses, $M_\mathrm{500c},$ that are $\lesssim$15% higher and scaled pressures $P/P_\mathrm{500c}$ that have $\lesssim$35% lower normalization than previously inferred. Our Debiased Pressure Profile (DPP) is well-fit by a Generalized Navarro-Frenk-White (GNFW) function, with parameters $[P_0,c_{500},α,β,γ]=[5.048,1.217,1.192,5.490,0.433]$ and does not require a mass-dependent correction term. When the DPP is used to model the Sunyaev-Zel'dovich (SZ) effect, we find that the integrated Compton $Y-M$ relation has only minor deviations from self-similar scaling. The thermal SZ angular power spectrum is lower in amplitude by approximately 30%, assuming nominal cosmological parameters (e.g. $Ω_\text{m}=0.3$, $σ_8 = 0.8$), and is broadly consistent with recent Planck results without requiring additional bias corrections.

扫码加入交流群

加入微信交流群

微信交流群二维码

扫码加入学术交流群,获取更多资源