论文标题
大流行新闻:主流新闻媒体和冠状病毒危机的Facebook页面 - 计算内容分析
Pandemic News: Facebook Pages of Mainstream News Media and the Coronavirus Crisis -- A Computational Content Analysis
论文作者
论文摘要
对于全球新闻媒体而言,COVID-19的大流行的发展一直是前所未有的挑战。尽管新闻业的目的是通过设计来处理但未知事件,但动态发展的情况以如此深刻的方式影响了生活的各个方面,即使是危机报告的常规也似乎不足。批评家指出,马赛报道和非批判性报道的倾向,新闻业太接近官方声明,对政治决定过于肯定。但是,到目前为止,危机期间新闻媒体表现的经验数据已经缺乏。当前的研究根据从2020年1月至2020年3月的大型德国数据集进行了新闻媒体的Facebook新闻媒体信息。使用计算内容分析方法,覆盖范围和互动,局部结构,相关的参与者,信息的消极情绪以及涉及捏造的新闻和阴谋理论的报道。在危机的各个阶段,近期Facebook报道的局部结构发生了变化,仅部分支持批评家的主张。最初的阶段缺乏局部广度,但是后来的阶段在与电晕有关的问题和社会问题上提供了广泛的报道。此外,新闻媒体在危机期间涵盖了虚假新闻和阴谋论,但他们始终如一地将其视为他们的成本,并揭穿了在公共场合流传的虚假主张。尽管对危机期间新闻业表现的一些批评得到了温和的经验支持,但该分析并未发现全身功能障碍的压倒性迹象。总体而言,新闻媒体并没有默认对统一的反应,也不拖延信息贫困的大流行新闻,但他们的回应是对危机的多方面报道。
The unfolding of the COVID-19 pandemic has been an unprecedented challenge for news media around the globe. While journalism is meant to process yet unknown events by design, the dynamically evolving situation affected all aspects of life in such profound ways that even the routines of crisis reporting seemed to be insufficient. Critics noted tendencies to horse-race reporting and uncritical coverage, with journalism being too close to official statements and too affirmative of political decisions. However, empirical data on the performance of journalistic news media during the crisis has been lacking thus far. The current study analyzes the Facebook messages of journalistic news media during the early Coronavirus crisis, based on a large German data set from January to March 2020. Using computational content analysis methods, reach and interactions, topical structure, relevant actors, negativity of messages, as well as the coverage of fabricated news and conspiracy theories were examined. The topical structure of the near-time Facebook coverage changed during various stages of the crisis, with just partial support for the claims of critics. The initial stages were somewhat lacking in topical breadth, but later stages offered a broad range of coverage on Corona-related issues and societal concerns. Further, journalistic media covered fake news and conspiracy theories during the crisis, but they consistently contextualized them as what they were and debunked the false claims circulating in public. While some criticism regarding the performance of journalism during the crisis received mild empirical support, the analysis did not find overwhelming signs of systemic dysfunctionalities. Overall, journalistic media did not default to a uniform reaction nor to sprawling, information-poor pandemic news, but they responded with a multi-perspective coverage of the crisis.