学术文献库

We consider the leader election problem in population protocol models. In pragmatic settings of population protocols, self-stabilization is a highly desired feature owing to its fault resilience and the benefit of initialization freedom. However, the design of self-stabilizing leader election is possible only under a strong assumption (i.e. the knowledge of the \emph{exact} size of a network) and rich computational resources (i.e. the number of states). Loose-stabilization, introduced by Sudo et al [Theoretical Computer Science, 2012], is a promising relaxed concept of self-stabilization to address the aforementioned issue. Loose-stabilization guarantees that starting from any configuration, the network will reach a safe configuration where a single leader exists within a short time, and thereafter it will maintain the single leader for a long time, but not forever. The main contribution of the paper is a time-optimal loosely-stabilizing leader election protocol. While the shortest convergence time achieved so far in loosely-stabilizing leader election is $O(\log^3 n)$ parallel time, the proposed protocol with design parameter $τ\ge 1$ attains $O(τ\log n)$ parallel convergence time and $Ω(n^τ)$ parallel holding time (i.e. the length of the period keeping the unique leader), both in expectation. This protocol is time-optimal in the sense of both the convergence and holding times in expectation because any loosely-stabilizing leader election protocol with the same length of the holding time is known to require $Ω(τ\log n)$ parallel time.