论文标题
文献计量学方法和科学学科的子场的共同作者加权
Co-author weighting in bibliometric methodology and subfields of a scientific discipline
论文作者
论文摘要
协作工作和合着者是现代科学发展的基础。但是，尚不清楚如何在基于成就的指标中衡量协作。合着者加权信用将扭曲引入纪律的书目描述中。它在协作上很大程度上不基于协作的结果 - 而是纯粹是由于合作的存在。就出版和引文影响而言，它人为地利用了一些子学科。为了了解合着者加权系统（如NRC的方法）如何给出信用，我们引入了信用空间。我们包括对物理学学科的研究，以说明该方法。引入指标来衡量授予子领域或一组作者的信用空间的比例。
Collaborative work and co-authorship are fundamental to the advancement of modern science. However, it is not clear how collaboration should be measured in achievement-based metrics. Co-author weighted credit introduces distortions into the bibliometric description of a discipline. It puts great weight on collaboration - not based on the results of collaboration - but purely because of the existence of collaborations. In terms of publication and citation impact, it artificially favors some subdisciplines. In order to understand how credit is given in a co-author weighted system (like the NRC's method), we introduced credit spaces. We include a study of the discipline of physics to illustrate the method. Indicators are introduced to measure the proportion of a credit space awarded to a subfield or a set of authors.
