论文标题
评论对本文的评论：“可以普遍提出中微子状态吗？''
Comment on the Comment on the paper "Can oscillating neutrino states be formulated universally?''
论文作者
论文摘要
最近，我们关于欧元中中微子振荡状态的定义的工作。物理。 J. C 80：68（2020），Arxiv：1902.01232 [HEP-PH]在Arxiv：2004.04739 [HEP-PH]中得到了评论。在本说明中，我们表明，与评论中的主张相反，我们上述作品不能在评论中所述的所谓风味fock空间方法的方案中复制。此外，我们明确地证明，在具有大量混合中微子的模型中，风味不可能存在。如果风味的植物空间方案是可行的，那么由于科尔曼定理的结果，这必然导致混合中微子田地的哈密顿量的风味数不变，而哈密顿式的造成了构建风味数字。 Quod est荒谬。
Recently, our work regarding the definition of oscillating neutrino states in Eur. Phys. J. C 80: 68 (2020), arxiv:1902.01232 [hep-ph] has been commented upon in arXiv:2004.04739 [hep-ph]. In this note we show that, contrary to the claim in the comment, our above-mentioned work cannot be reproduced in the scheme of the so-called flavour Fock space approach described in the comment. Moreover, we prove explicitly that a flavour Fock space cannot exist in a model with massive mixed neutrinos. If the flavour Fock space scheme were viable, it would necessarily lead, as a consequence of Coleman's theorem, to the flavour number invariance of the Hamiltonian of mixed neutrino fields, while the Hamiltonian is by construction flavour number violating. Quod est absurdum.
