论文标题
木星的流量结构拟合juno不对称的重力测量范围
The range of Jupiter's flow structures fitting the Juno asymmetric gravity measurements
论文作者
论文摘要
通过Juno航天器测量的不对称重力场允许估计木星的区域喷气机的深度,表明风在云层级别以下约$ 3000 $公里。该估计值是基于分析的,结合了所有测量的奇数重力谐波$ j_ {3} $,$ j_ {5} $,$ j_ {7} $和$ j_ {9} $,但尚未分别研究风配置文件对每个人的风配依赖性。此外,这些计算假设云水平风的子午曲线延伸到深度。但是,朱诺微波测量所暗示的内部喷射轮廓可能与云水平的轮廓变化,与云级相比,深度的Nadir亮度温度曲线更平滑。在这里,我们详细分析了木星深喷射流的可能子午线和垂直结构。我们发现,每个奇数重力谐波都会以不同的深度约束流动,而$ j_ {3} $在低于$ 3000 $ km,$ j_ {5} $的深度上是最主要的,总体上是最限制的,并且如果其他奇怪的谐波在测量范围内,则根本不限制流量。从扰动到云级风构建的内部流量曲线可以使更广泛的垂直风轮廓范围更广泛,但是当轮廓与云级别的差异很大时,匹配重力数据的能力会大大降低。总体而言,我们发现,尽管不像云水平的内部风轮廓是可能的,但它们在统计学上是不可能的。但是,略微平滑的轮廓(类似于Juno的微波辐射仪温度在深度)仍然与重力测量值兼容。
The asymmetric gravity field measured by the Juno spacecraft allowed estimation of the depth of Jupiter's zonal jets, showing that the winds extend approximately $3000$ km beneath the cloud-level. This estimate was based on an analysis using a combination of all measured odd gravity harmonics $J_{3}$, $J_{5}$, $J_{7}$, and $J_{9}$, but the wind profile dependence on each of them separately has not been investigated. Furthermore, these calculations assumed the meridional profile of the cloud-level wind extends to depth. However, it is possible that the interior jet profile varies from that of the cloud-level as hinted by the Juno microwave measurement that find a smoother nadir brightness temperature profile at depth compared to the cloud-level. Here we analyze in detail the possible meridional and vertical structure of Jupiter's deep jet-streams. We find that each odd gravity harmonic constrains the flow at a different depth, with $J_{3}$ being the most dominant at depths below $3000$ km, $J_{5}$ being the most restrictive overall, and $J_{9}$ not constraining the flow at all if the other odd harmonics are within the measurement range. Interior flow profiles constructed from perturbations to the cloud-level winds allow a more extensive range of vertical wind profiles, yet when the profiles differ substantially from the cloud-level, the ability to match the gravity data reduces significantly. Overall, we find that while interior wind profiles that do not resemble the cloud-level are possible, they are statistically unlikely. However, slightly smoother profiles, which resemble the Juno's microwave radiometer temperature profile at depth, are still compatible with the gravity measurements.