论文标题
个人经历的19009年大流行
The COVID-19 pandemic as experienced by the individual
论文作者
论文摘要
正在进行的共同-19大流行在各个国家的强度程度上取得了不同程度的进展,这表明分析它们之间有所不同的因素很重要。我们研究了“人口加权密度”的度量,这些度量捕获了一个随机选择的个体所感知的密度。这些人口密度的衡量标准可以显着解释欧洲国家之间共vid-19的初始传播率的差异。但是,这种措施不能解释全球范围的差异,尤其是在考虑东亚国家或以后研究流行病时。因此,为了控制响应于19的国家 /地区的国家级别差异,我们考虑了霍夫斯泰德提出的个人主义的跨文化衡量标准。这种分数可以大大解释欧洲,北美和东亚流行病的规模的差异。使用我们对人口加密密度的度量和霍夫斯泰德评分,我们可以显着解释整个欧洲和北美流行病的当前差异的一半。通过控制对病毒和人口密度的国家水平的反应,我们对Covid-19的全球发病率的分析可以帮助将注意力集中在对各个国家有效的流行病控制措施上。
The ongoing COVID-19 pandemic has progressed with varying degrees of intensity in individual countries, suggesting it is important to analyse factors that vary between them. We study measures of `population-weighted density', which capture density as perceived by a randomly chosen individual. These measures of population density can significantly explain variation in the initial rate of spread of COVID-19 between countries within Europe. However, such measures do not explain differences on a global scale, particularly when considering countries in East Asia, or looking later into the epidemics. Therefore, to control for country-level differences in response to COVID-19 we consider the cross-cultural measure of individualism proposed by Hofstede. This score can significantly explain variation in the size of epidemics across Europe, North America, and East Asia. Using both our measure of population-weighted density and the Hofstede score we can significantly explain half the variation in the current size of epidemics across Europe and North America. By controlling for country-level responses to the virus and population density, our analysis of the global incidence of COVID-19 can help focus attention on epidemic control measures that are effective for individual countries.