论文标题
制定和批判性地检查全局21-CM信号分析的假设:如何避免在单光谱拟合中出现的假槽
Formulating and critically examining the assumptions of global 21-cm signal analyses: How to avoid the false troughs that can appear in single spectrum fits
论文作者
论文摘要
全局21-CM信号分析固有的假设很少被描述。在本文中,我们列出了给定声称检测到全局21-CM信号的基础假设的一般列表。然后,我们为两个不同的分析指定了这些假设的形式:1)边缘团队在亮度温度下表现出一个与天空前景分开建模的边缘团队执行的,以及2)新的,所谓的最小假设分析(MAA),这使信号成为最保守的假设。我们使用边缘纬度的各种光束加权前景模拟上的边缘分析显示拟合,没有添加信号。根据所使用的光束,由于前景模型的无效,这些模拟产生了大型假槽,以描述梁变色性的组合和天空中的银河平面的形状,其残差是由Ad Hoc的高斯信号模型捕获的。另一方面,MAA通过在不同的时间箱中包含许多光谱,并允许确切地建模任何可能的21厘米光谱,从而提供强大的拟合。我们提供了不确定性水平和示例信号重构,可以使用MAA进行不同的时间箱。有了足够的时间垃圾箱,可以确定MAA的真实21厘米信号至$ <10美元的噪声水平。
The assumptions inherent to global 21-cm signal analyses are rarely delineated. In this paper, we formulate a general list of suppositions underlying a given claimed detection of the global 21-cm signal. Then, we specify the form of these assumptions for two different analyses: 1) the one performed by the EDGES team showing an absorption trough in brightness temperature that they modeled separately from the sky foreground and 2) a new, so-called Minimum Assumption Analysis (MAA), that makes the most conservative assumptions possible for the signal. We show fits using the EDGES analysis on various beam-weighted foreground simulations from the EDGES latitude with no signal added. Depending on the beam used, these simulations produce large false troughs due to the invalidity of the foreground model to describe the combination of beam chromaticity and the shape of the Galactic plane in the sky, the residuals of which are captured by the ad hoc flattened Gaussian signal model. On the other hand, the MAA provides robust fits by including many spectra at different time bins and allowing any possible 21-cm spectrum to be modeled exactly. We present uncertainty levels and example signal reconstructions found with the MAA for different numbers of time bins. With enough time bins, one can determine the true 21-cm signal with the MAA to $<10$ times the noise level.