论文标题
合并在BCG群集对齐中的演变和作用。从宇宙水电模拟的视图
Evolution and Role of Mergers in the BCG-Cluster Alignment. A View from Cosmological Hydro-Simulations
论文作者
论文摘要
已经报道了群集与其最亮星系(BCG)之间对齐时间的时间演变的矛盾结果。我们通过分析$ M_ {200} | _ {z = 0} \ gtrsim 10^{15} \,m_ \ odot $,加上5个较小的大量,$ 1 \ 1 \ times 10^{14} {14} \ sim m _ {200} ims imm M _ {200}} 0} ims,我们通过分析24个大型聚类的宇宙学水电模拟来研究此主题。 10^{14} \,m_ \ odot $,已经证明可以产生现实的BCG群众。我们通过聚类星系的分布和暗物质(DM)光环计算BCG对齐。在Redshift $ z = 0 $时,模拟BCG的主要轴及其主机群集星系发行版平均在20 $^\ Circ $之内对齐。 BCG与DM光环的对齐甚至更紧。对齐持续到$ z \ lyssim2 $,没有明显的进化。考虑预测对准时,该结果仍在继续,尽管信号较弱。在BCG群集对齐的一致性之前,与物质分布($ 3R_ {200} $)的群集对齐已经以$ z \ sim4 $为位,典型的角度为$ 35^\ circ $。事实证明,BCG也与相同的物质分布保持一致,尽管始终在较小程度上。这些结果在一起可能意味着BCG群集对齐是以外部方式进行的。根据它们的频率和几何形状,合并可以促进,破坏或削弱对齐方式。没有经历最近主要合并的集群通常会更放松并与他们的BCG保持一致。反过来,更接近簇伸长轴的积聚倾向于改善对齐的比对,而不是接近群集次要轴的积聚。
Contradictory results have been reported on the time evolution of the alignment between clusters and their Brightest Cluster Galaxy (BCG). We study this topic by analyzing cosmological hydro-simulations of 24 massive clusters with $M_{200}|_{z=0} \gtrsim 10^{15}\, M_\odot$, plus 5 less massive with $1 \times 10^{14} \lesssim M_{200}|_{z=0} \lesssim 7 \times 10^{14}\, M_\odot$, which have already proven to produce realistic BCG masses. We compute the BCG alignment with both the distribution of cluster galaxies and the dark matter (DM) halo. At redshift $z=0$, the major axes of the simulated BCGs and their host cluster galaxy distributions are aligned on average within 20$^\circ$. The BCG alignment with the DM halo is even tighter. The alignment persists up to $z\lesssim2$ with no evident evolution. This result continues, although with a weaker signal, when considering the projected alignment. The cluster alignment with the surrounding distribution of matter ($3R_{200}$) is already in place at $z\sim4$ with a typical angle of $35^\circ$, before the BCG-Cluster alignment develops. The BCG turns out to be also aligned with the same matter distribution, albeit always to a lesser extent. These results taken together might imply that the BCG-Cluster alignment occurs in an outside-in fashion. Depending on their frequency and geometry, mergers can promote, destroy or weaken the alignments. Clusters that do not experience recent major mergers are typically more relaxed and aligned with their BCG. In turn, accretions closer to the cluster elongation axis tend to improve the alignment as opposed to accretions closer to the cluster minor axis.