论文标题

一个人口统计学模型,用于估计COVID-19感染总数

A demographic scaling model for estimating the total number of COVID-19 infections

论文作者

Bohk-Ewald, Christina, Dudel, Christian, Myrskylä, Mikko

论文摘要

了解199的广泛传播对于检查大流行的进展至关重要。尽管努力仔细监测大流行,但确认病例的数量可能会低估感染总数。我们介绍了一个人口统计学缩放模型,以基于最小数据要求的广泛适用方法来估计Covid-19感染:COVID-19相关的死亡,感染率(IFRS)和生命表。由于许多国家缺乏对特定年龄IFRS的可靠估计,因此我们使用剩余的预期寿命作为标记来扩展IFR,以说明年龄结构,健康状况和医疗服务的差异。截至2020年5月13日,在10个共同死亡人数最多的10个国家中,感染的数量估计为四个[95%的预测间隔:2-11],比确认病例的数量高。越野变化很高。估计的感染次数为意大利的140万(确认病例的数量六倍);美国的310万(确认案件数量的2.2倍);和德国确认案件的数量是相对广泛的德国案件数量的1.8倍。但是,根据局部血清阳性研究,我们的患病率估计值明显低于大多数其他人。我们介绍了用于量化死亡数据中所需的偏差的公式,以便重现其他地方发布的估计值。这种偏见分析表明,两次死亡的死亡人数被严重低估了两个或更多。或者,基于血清阳性的结果被高估了,对总人群不代表。

Understanding how widely COVID-19 has spread is critical for examining the pandemic's progression. Despite efforts to carefully monitor the pandemic, the number of confirmed cases may underestimate the total number of infections. We introduce a demographic scaling model to estimate COVID-19 infections using an broadly applicable approach that is based on minimal data requirements: COVID-19 related deaths, infection fatality rates (IFRs), and life tables. As many countries lack reliable estimates of age-specific IFRs, we scale IFRs between countries using remaining life expectancy as a marker to account for differences in age structures, health conditions, and medical services. Across 10 countries with most COVID-19 deaths as of May 13, 2020, the number of infections is estimated to be four [95% prediction interval: 2-11] times higher than the number of confirmed cases. Cross-country variation is high. The estimated number of infections is 1.4 million (six times the number of confirmed cases) for Italy; 3.1 million (2.2 times the number of confirmed cases) for the U.S.; and 1.8 times the number of confirmed cases for Germany, where testing has been comparatively extensive. Our prevalence estimates, however, are markedly lower than most others based on local seroprevalence studies. We introduce formulas for quantifying the bias that is required in our data on deaths in order to reproduce estimates published elsewhere. This bias analysis shows that either COVID-19 deaths are severely underestimated, by a factor of two or more; or alternatively, the seroprevalence based results are overestimates and not representative for the total population.

扫码加入交流群

加入微信交流群

微信交流群二维码

扫码加入学术交流群,获取更多资源