论文标题
使用数字插入术评估基于激光衍射的粒度测量值
Evaluation of laser diffraction-based particle size measurements using digital inline holography
论文作者
论文摘要
小颗粒(例如灰尘,液滴,气泡等)的尺寸分布的测量对于环境科学,公共卫生,工业制造等广泛应用至关重要。激光衍射(LD),这是一种基于模型反转的这种应用的广泛使用的方法,该方法依赖于模型的属性。此外,简单的前坐标校准通常会忽略采样偏差,例如速度差异,这是作为附加误差源引入的。相比之下,单个相机相干成像技术数字内语全息图(DIH)都可以测量粒度分布,而无需基于模型的反转,并且可以直接提供有关粒子形状特征的信息。在这项研究中,我们评估了LD系统在使用基于原位DIH的成像作为参考的扁平风扇喷雾剂中表征的多分散液滴的性能。检查了两种技术的系统差异。提出了基于液滴 - 针对性的尺寸分布的校正,以补偿观察到的差异。我们使用经历差分沉降的NIST标准多分散颗粒验证校正,然后将校正应用于多分散喷雾液滴测量。该校正改善了在两个数量级上的液滴的LD和DIH尺寸分布之间的一致性,但在LD仍低估了大小高于1 mm处的液滴的分数。这种低估可能与液滴的复杂振荡和旋转运动有关,这些液滴和旋转运动无法通过测量或通过校正算法建模而没有其他信息来忠实地捕获。
The measurements of size distribution of small particles (e.g. dusts, droplets, bubbles, etc.) are critical for a broad range of applications in environmental science, public health, industrial manufacturing, etc. Laser diffraction (LD), a widely used method for such applications depends on model-based inversion with underlying assumptions on particle properties. Furthermore, the presence of sampling biases such as velocity differentials are often overlooked by the simple ex-situ calibrations, which introduces as an additional source of error. In contrast, digital inline holography (DIH), a single camera coherent imaging technique, can both measure particle size distributions without the need for a model-based inversion and can directly provide information on the shape characteristics of the particles. In this study, we evaluate the performance of an LD system in characterizing polydisperse droplets produced in a flat fan spray using in-situ DIH based imaging as a reference. The systematic differences in the two techniques are examined. A droplet-trajectory-based correction for the LD-inferred size distributions is proposed to compensate for the observed differences. We validate the correction using NIST standard polydisperse particles undergoing differential settling, and then apply the correction to polydisperse spray droplet measurements. The correction improves agreement between LD and DIH size distributions for droplets over two orders of magnitude, but with LD still underestimating the fraction of droplets at sizes above ~1 mm. This underestimation is possibly linked to the complex oscillatory and rotational motion of droplets which cannot be faithfully captured by measurement or modelled by the correction algorithm without additional information.