论文标题

$ \ mathrm {\ sqrt {s} = 13 tev} $ proton-proton碰撞与LHCF ARM2检测器中产生的能量流量,横截面和平均非弹性的平均非弹性。

Measurement of energy flow, cross section and average inelasticity of forward neutrons produced in $\mathrm{\sqrt{s} = 13 TeV}$ proton-proton collisions with the LHCf Arm2 detector

论文作者

Adriani, O., Berti, E., Bonechi, L., Bongi, M., D'Alessandro, R., Detti, S., Haguenauer, M., Itow, Y., Kasahara, K., Menjo, H., Muraki, Y., Ohashi, K., Papini, P., Ricciarini, S., Sako, T., Sakurai, N., Sato, K., Tamura, T., Tiberio, A., Torii, S., Tricomi, A., Turner, W. C., Ueno, M.

论文摘要

在本文中,我们报告了在$ \ sqrt {s} = 13 $ tev proton-proton碰撞中产生的能量流,横截面和平均非弹性的测量。这些量是从包含差分生产横截面获得的,该横截面使用LHCF ARM2检测器在CERN大型强子对撞机上测量。测量值在六个假性区域进行:其中三个($η> 10.75 $,$ 8.99 <η<9.21 $和$ 8.80 <η<8.99 $),尽管接受较小,但不确定性较小,但较大的不确定性已经在以前的工作中出版,而$ 10.065($ 10.06 <10.05 $ $ n. 0.05 <$ n.65 <$ n.65 < $ 8.65 <η<8.80 $)首次提出。分析是使用2015年6月获得的数据集进行的,其相应的集成光度为$ \ MATHRM {0.194〜NB^{ - 1}} $。将实验测量结果与用于模拟宇宙射线阵雨的几种HADRONIC相互作用模型的期望进行比较,这些发电机均未在选择用于分析的所有相空间中具有令人满意的一致性。 $η> 10.75 $的包含差分生产横截面不会由任何模型重现,而结果仍然表明较低的假性属性下的显着但不太严重的偏差。根据假性区域的不同,与数据显示最佳总体一致的发电机是sibyll 2.3或epos-lhc。此外,除了最向前的区域外,派生的能量流和横截面分布最好由EPOS-LHC复制。最后,即使这些模型都没有以令人满意的方式描述弹性分布,但提取的平均非弹性性与QGSJET II-04值一致,而其他大多数发电机的值都在实验不确定性之外给出的值。

In this paper, we report the measurement of the energy flow, the cross section and the average inelasticity of forward neutrons (+ antineutrons) produced in $\sqrt{s} = 13$ TeV proton-proton collisions. These quantities are obtained from the inclusive differential production cross section, measured using the LHCf Arm2 detector at the CERN Large Hadron Collider. The measurements are performed in six pseudorapidity regions: three of them ($η> 10.75$, $8.99 < η< 9.21$ and $8.80 < η< 8.99$), albeit with smaller acceptance and larger uncertainties, were already published in a previous work, whereas the remaining three ($10.06 < η< 10.75$, $9.65 < η< 10.06$ and $8.65 < η< 8.80$) are presented here for the first time. The analysis was carried out using a data set acquired in June 2015 with a corresponding integrated luminosity of $\mathrm{0.194~nb^{-1}}$. Comparing the experimental measurements with the expectations of several hadronic interaction models used to simulate cosmic ray air showers, none of these generators resulted to have a satisfactory agreement in all the phase space selected for the analysis. The inclusive differential production cross section for $η> 10.75$ is not reproduced by any model, whereas the results still indicate a significant but less serious deviation at lower pseudorapidities. Depending on the pseudorapidity region, the generators showing the best overall agreement with data are either SIBYLL 2.3 or EPOS-LHC. Furthermore, apart from the most forward region, the derived energy flow and cross section distributions are best reproduced by EPOS-LHC. Finally, even if none of the models describe the elasticity distribution in a satisfactory way, the extracted average inelasticity is consistent with the QGSJET II-04 value, while most of the other generators give values that lie just outside the experimental uncertainties.

扫码加入交流群

加入微信交流群

微信交流群二维码

扫码加入学术交流群,获取更多资源