论文标题
NFV平台设计:调查
NFV Platform Design: A Survey
论文作者
论文摘要
由于传统网络中本质上效率低下的服务提供,网络功能虚拟化(NFV)不断引起行业和学术界的关注。通过在商品硬件上合并的软件网络功能,通过更换专门建造的,昂贵的专有网络设备,NFV设想向更敏捷和开放的服务提供范式转变,资本支出(CAPEX)和运营支出(OPEX)(OPEX)。尽管如此,就像任何复杂的系统一样,NFV平台通常由软件和硬件组件组成,通常会根据不同的动机或用例结合不同的设计选择。这种复杂的替代方案集合使网络运营商做出正确的选择非常艰巨。尽管已经致力于调查NFV的不同方面的许多努力,但它们都没有专门针对NFV平台或试图探索设计空间。在本文中,我们介绍了NFV平台设计的全面调查。我们的研究仅针对现有的NFV平台实现。我们从标准参考NFV平台的架构视图开始,并根据设计的主要目的介绍现有NFV平台的分类。然后,我们彻底探索设计空间,并详细介绍每个平台选择的实现选择。我们认为,我们的研究为网络运营商或服务提供商提供了详细的指南,以根据其各自的要求选择或实施最合适的NFV平台。请注意,该报告是发表的IEEE TNSM论文[1]的补充文件。我们将定期更新此文档,以包括新提出的NFV平台和设计选择。
Due to the intrinsically inefficient service provisioning in traditional networks, Network Function Virtualization (NFV) keeps gaining attention from both industry and academia. By replacing the purpose-built, expensive, proprietary network equipment with software network functions consolidated on commodity hardware, NFV envisions a shift towards a more agile and open service provisioning paradigm with much lower capital expenditure (CapEx) and operational expenditure (OpEx). Nonetheless, just like any complex system, NFV platforms commonly consist of abounding software and hardware components and usually incorporate disparate design choices based on distinct motivations or use cases. This broad collection of convoluted alternatives makes it extremely arduous for network operators to make proper choices. Although numerous efforts have been devoted to investigating different aspects of NFV, none of them specifically focused on NFV platforms or attempted to explore the design space. In this paper, we present a comprehensive survey on NFV platform design. Our study solely targets existing NFV platform implementations. We begin with an architectural view of the standard reference NFV platform and present our taxonomy of existing NFV platforms based on the principal purpose of design. Then we thoroughly explore the design space and elaborate on the implementation choices each platform opts for. We believe that our study gives a detailed guideline for network operators or service providers to choose or implement the most appropriate NFV platforms based on their respective requirements. Note that this report serves as a complementary document for a published IEEE TNSM paper [1]. We will periodically update this document to include the newly proposed NFV platforms and design choices.