论文标题

评估不同矩形扫描策略的茎成像

Evaluation of different rectangular scan strategies for STEM imaging

论文作者

Velazco, Abner, Nord, Magnus, Béché, Armand, Verbeeck, Johan

论文摘要

茎成像通常是通过在样品上扫描聚焦的电子探针来进行的。在这里,我们研究并比较了三种不同的扫描模式,利用可编程扫描引擎,该引擎允许任意设置样本上连续访问的探针位置的顺序。我们将典型的光栅扫描与所谓的“蛇”模式进行比较,其中每行扫描方向被逆转和一种新型的希尔伯特扫描模式,该模式迅速改变了扫描方向并提供了两个扫描方向的均匀处理。我们通过改变停留时间并评估行为相对于样品漂移而实验评估单晶测试样品上的成像性能。我们证明了希尔伯特扫描模式在存在样品漂移的情况下更忠实地代表图像的高频含量的能力。还表明,希尔伯特扫描在测量获得的扫描图像的晶格参数时提供了减少的偏差,同时在两个扫描方向上保持相似的精度,这在例如进行应变分析。与通过反式校正进行栅格扫描相比,由于仅发生小探针运动步骤,蛇和希尔伯特扫描均受益于剂量。

STEM imaging is typically performed by raster scanning a focused electron probe over a sample. Here we investigate and compare three different scan patterns, making use of a programmable scan engine that allows to arbitrarily set the sequence of probe positions that are consecutively visited on the sample. We compare the typical raster scan with a so-called 'snake' pattern where the scan direction is reversed after each row and a novel Hilbert scan pattern that changes scan direction rapidly and provides an homogeneous treatment of both scan directions. We experimentally evaluate the imaging performance on a single crystal test sample by varying dwell time and evaluating behaviour with respect to sample drift. We demonstrate the ability of the Hilbert scan pattern to more faithfully represent the high frequency content of the image in the presence of sample drift. It is also shown that Hilbert scanning provides reduced bias when measuring lattice parameters from the obtained scanned images while maintaining similar precision in both scan directions which is especially important when e.g. performing strain analysis. Compared to raster scanning with flyback correction, both snake and Hilbert scanning benefit from dose reduction as only small probe movement steps occur.

扫码加入交流群

加入微信交流群

微信交流群二维码

扫码加入学术交流群,获取更多资源