论文标题
通过Wikipedia的科学：通过共同引文网络对开放知识的新颖代表
Science through Wikipedia: A novel representation of open knowledge through co-citation networks
论文作者
论文摘要
这项研究从Wikipedia的角度提供了科学的概述。已经建立了一种方法来分析维基百科编辑如何通过对科学论文的提及来看待科学。共同引用的方法已适应了这种情况，以生成探路者网络（PFNET），该网络强调了最相关的科学期刊和类别及其相互作用，以了解如何通过此开放的开放百科全书来了解科学文献的消费方式。除此之外，他们的过时已经通过价格指数进行了研究。最初已考虑了AltMetric.com上总共可用的1 433 457参考。在对Elsevier CitesCore指标的数据进行预处理并将其链接到847 512的847 512参考文献之后，193 802 Wikipedia文章与598 746属于Scopus索引的14149期刊的科学文章。正如强调的结果，我们发现“医学”和“生物化学，遗传学和分子生物学”论文存在重要的存在，并且最重要的期刊本质上是多学科的，这也表明，更可能引用高影响力因素期刊。此外，只有13.44％的Wikipedia引用是开放访问期刊。
This study provides an overview of science from the Wikipedia perspective. A methodology has been established for the analysis of how Wikipedia editors regard science through their references to scientific papers. The method of co-citation has been adapted to this context in order to generate Pathfinder networks (PFNET) that highlight the most relevant scientific journals and categories, and their interactions in order to find out how scientific literature is consumed through this open encyclopaedia. In addition to this, their obsolescence has been studied through Price index. A total of 1 433 457 references available at Altmetric.com have been initially taken into account. After pre-processing and linking them to the data from Elsevier's CiteScore Metrics the sample was reduced to 847 512 references made by 193 802 Wikipedia articles to 598 746 scientific articles belonging to 14 149 journals indexed in Scopus. As highlighted results we found a significative presence of "Medicine" and "Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology" papers and that the most important journals are multidisciplinary in nature, suggesting also that high-impact factor journals were more likely to be cited. Furthermore, only 13.44% of Wikipedia citations are to Open Access journals.
