论文标题
高红移时IgM的温度:冲击加热和高马赫问题
The temperature of IGM at high redshifts: shock heating and high mach problem
论文作者
论文摘要
黑暗时代的宇宙气体的热历史仍然在很大程度上未知。重要的是要量化相关物理对$ z = 10 $和$ z \ sim 30 $之间的IgM温度的影响,以解释最近和来临的观察结果,包括Edges报告的结果。我们使用一组由三种不同代码执行的固定网格宇宙学水动力学模拟,重新审视由于该时代的结构形成冲击而引起的气体加热。在我们的所有模拟中,自$ z> 30美元以来,宇宙气体预计将处于多相状态。高密度峰周围的气体逐渐发展出比$ t \ proptoρ^{2/3} $,大约$ t \ proptoρ^{2} $,从$ z = 30 $到$ z = 11 $的关系,可能是由于冲击加热而引起的。同时,空隙区域的气体往往具有较大的本地马赫数,并且其热状态因代码而异。在$ 11-20 $的红移范围内,在我们的仿真中,在CMB温度上加热的气体冲击的质量比以前的半分析结果高2至8。在$ z = 15 $中,分数从$ \ sim 19 \%$到$ 52 \%\%在不同的代码中。 $ z = 11 $和$ z = 20 $,气温$ <1/t _ {\ rm {k}}}> _ m^{ - 1} $在两个代码中被预计为$ \ sim 10-20 $ k,比绝热冷却模型高得多。但是,在我们的模拟中,Ramses进行的$ <1/t _ {\ rm {k}}> _ m^{ - 1} $的模拟预计甚至低于解释边缘结果所需的温度。鉴于当前不同的代码给出了不同的预测,这似乎是一个挑战,即在$ z \ sim 17 $的模拟中对气体温度进行稳固的预测。
The thermal history of cosmic gas in the Dark Ages remains largely unknown. It is important to quantify the impact of relevant physics on the IGM temperature between $z=10$ and $z \sim 30$, in order to interpret recent and oncoming observations, including results reported by EDGES. We revisit the gas heating due to structure formation shocks in this era, using a set of fixed grid cosmological hydrodynamical simulations performed by three different codes. In all our simulations, the cosmic gas is predicted to be in multiphase state since $z>30$. The gas surrounding high density peaks gradually develops a relation more sharp than $T \propto ρ^{2/3}$, approximately $T \propto ρ^{2}$, from $z=30$ to $z=11$, might due to shock heating. Meanwhile, the gas in void region tends to have a large local mach number, and their thermal state varies significantly from code to code. In the redshift range $11-20$, the mass fraction of gas shock heated above the CMB temperature in our simulations is larger than previous semi-analytical results by a factor of 2 to 8. At $z=15$, the fraction varies from $\sim 19\%$ to $52 \%$ among different codes. Between $z=11$ and $z=20$, the gas temperature $<1/T_{\rm{K}}>_M^{-1}$ is predicted to be $\sim 10-20$ K by two codes, much higher than the adiabatic cooling model and some previous works. However, in our simulations performed by RAMSES, $<1/T_{\rm{K}}>_M^{-1}$ is predicted to be even below the temperature required to explain result of the EDGES. Given the fact that different codes give different predictions, currently, it seems a challenge to make solid prediction on the temperature of gas at $z \sim 17$ in simulations.