论文标题

具有不同深色能量的宇宙学模型的光环计数

Halo Counts-in-cells for Cosmological Models with Different Dark Energy

论文作者

Wen, Di, Kemball, Athol J., Saslaw, William C.

论文摘要

我们检查了描述暗能量宇宙模拟(DEUS)中暗物质光环的概率分布函数。我们描述了红移$ z = 0 $ to $ z = 4 $之间的测量值和非线性尺度。与模拟相比,将重力准准平衡分布(GQED),负二项式分布(NBD),泊松型含量分布(PLN)和带有偏置参数(PLNB)的泊松含量分布(PLNB)的最佳拟合。拟合在一系列红移和尺度上相当始终如一地同意。为了区分Quintessence(RPCDM)和Phantom($ W $ CDM)的暗能量与$λ$暗能量,我们提出了一种新方法,比较了计数中计数概率分布函数的模型参数。我们发现,售价为$ 2-25H^{ - 1} $ MPC量表的halo计数的平均值和方差在红移之间$ 0.65 <z <4 $在不同的深色能量宇宙学上显示出显着的百分比差异。在$ 15-25H^{ - 1} $ MPC秤上,NBD中的$ G $参数,PLN中的$ω$参数,$ b $和PLNB中的$ C_B $参数显示出与较小尺度相比,不同的深色能量宇宙学的差异更大。 $ 2-6H^{ - 1} $ MPC量表,峰度和GQED中的$ b $参数显示出,不同的暗能量宇宙学的百分比差异要大于更大的尺度。对于DEU模拟中探讨的宇宙学,相对于$λ$ CDM,RPCDM的这些统计数据的百分比差异通常会增加,而RedShift通常会从几个百分比增加到$ Z = 4 $的较大百分比。将我们的方法应用于仿真和星系调查可以提供一种有用的方法来区分一般的暗能量模型和宇宙学。

We examine the counts-in-cells probability distribution functions that describe dark matter halos in the Dark Energy Universe Simulations (DEUS). We describe the measurements between redshifts $z=0$ to $z=4$ on both linear and non-linear scales. The best-fits of the gravitational quasi-equilibrium distribution (GQED), the negative binomial distribution (NBD), the Poisson-Lognormal distribution (PLN), and the Poisson-Lognormal distribution with a bias parameter (PLNB) are compared to simulations. The fits agree reasonably consistently over a range of redshifts and scales. To distinguish quintessence (RPCDM) and phantom ($w$CDM) dark energy from $Λ$ dark energy, we present a new method that compares the model parameters of the counts-in-cells probability distribution functions. We find that the mean and variance of the halo counts-in-cells on $2-25h^{-1}$Mpc scales between redshifts $0.65<z<4$ show significant percentage differences for different dark energy cosmologies. On $15-25h^{-1}$Mpc scales, the $g$ parameter in NBD, $ω$ parameter in PLN, $b$ and $C_b$ parameters in PLNB show larger percentage differences for different dark energy cosmologies than on smaller scales. On $2-6h^{-1}$Mpc scales, kurtosis and the $b$ parameter in the GQED show larger percentage differences for different dark energy cosmologies than on larger scales. For cosmologies explored in the DEUS simulations, the percentage differences between these statistics for the RPCDM and $w$CDM dark energy cosmologies relative to $Λ$CDM generally increases with redshift from a few percent to significantly larger percentages at $z=4$. Applying our method to simulations and galaxy surveys can provide a useful way to distinguish among dark energy models and cosmologies in general.

扫码加入交流群

加入微信交流群

微信交流群二维码

扫码加入学术交流群,获取更多资源